• Augapfel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    babies are considered a year old on the day they’re born

    Is there any useful idea behind this? That sounds completely dumb.

    • Troy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s just semantics. When you are born, you are in your first year of life, not your zeroth year of life. After a full year, you are one year old. Grammar varies from language to language, and sometimes one feels more natural.

      Imagine everyone in English said “I’m in my 32nd year” instead of “I’m 31 years old.” Now you meet a foreigner who says the opposite. Translation issues abound!

        • Troy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re absolutely right. But as most people don’t measure their age in centuries (yet), it isn’t a problem.

          I’m hoping the debate emerges when I’m in my 7th century.

      • ssjmarx@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        When you are born, you are in your first year of life, not your zeroth year of life.

        There are one type of person in this world. Those that understand arrays, and those that don’t.

        • Soviet Snake@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, you could have an array starting at zero, some old languages or pseudo code languages do that.