• magic_lobster_party@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I can’t speak from the British Commonwealth perspective, but from a Swedish perspective my opinion is this regarding having a monarch:

      Yeah, it might not reflect our modern values well, but since the (Swedish) monarch is mostly ceremonial and completely unpolitical, there’s actually quite little to hate about it. They’re just the mascot of the country. There’s far more pressing issues in our country than having that confused old guy as head of state.

      At least he doesn’t possess nuclear launch codes.

      • sugartits@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        there’s actually quite little to hate about it

        Where does their money come from?

        • rmuk@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          I don’t know about Sweden, but the UK monarch is an aristocrat that owns loads of land, businesses, trusts, etc, and his money comes from that. At least, he gets to keep about a quarter of it; the rest goes to the Government.

      • rammer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        In Sweden that might be true. But in the UK the monarch has some vestigial power. Even though everyone assures that if he ever tried to actually use those powers they would be taken away. But it doesn’t change the fact that in the UK the monarch still has power.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Let’s see where we’re at after November before we start shit talking too much.
      There’s a very high chance that if Trump wins, he’ll make himself a monarch