Looks expensive. The grey ones are the broken ones.

  • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    50
    ·
    3 months ago

    Maybe it’s just good footage. Photovoltaics are synergetic with fossil fuel power, both in terms of green washing and actually prolonging dependence.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        No, because they’re shitposting at best and trolling at worst. See their other comments.

      • Liz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I can tell you right now whatever alternative solution they have, no one will accept.

      • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        Because photovoltaic and wind power are inherently unreliable, they create a need for fossil fuel power sources to always be ready to go in order to fill in the gaps. Fossil fuel companies like to talk about how they’re all for a green transition, but what they don’t say is that they want the transition to last forever.

        • Thetimefarm@lemm.ee
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          This is brain dead, we have plenty of green energy storage methods available. We just need a big enough green energy surplus to store.

          • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            3 months ago

            The benevolent fossil fuel industry will be there to help with every step of this revolutionary transition to renewable energy.

            • Thetimefarm@lemm.ee
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              3 months ago

              You know what, you’re right, we’re all fucked, there is nothing we can do, let’s gather round and jerk ourselves off about how miserable we all are until the warm embrace of the ocean washes over our heads. Thanks for helping me finally see that.

              • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                3 months ago

                What’s with the histrionics? Nuclear power is a mature technology that’s practically a drop in replacement for fossil fuel power. No need to redesign the grid to make it smart and add problematic battery storage.

                • bbuez@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I wasnt going to comment but

                  Nuclear is practically a drop in replacement for fossil fuel

                  got me real good, keep up the good trolling.

      • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        There are good applications for PV, but it is not reliable thermal power, so it will never sufficiently dispace fossil fuels. We need nuclear, concentrated solar, and/or deep-well geothermal power plants in order to accomplish that.

          • isles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I think they might be taking issue primarily with the “reliability”, the argument that solar is all well and good, but because generation isn’t uniform, it can’t fully replace fossil fuels. And I can see the argument for using nuclear for base-load and supplement with solar as it’s available to use.

            • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              i know what they’re saying, but they’re objectively wrong. Sure it’s hard, it’s not the most trivial thing to do. Harder than engineering, designing, and building a CCG turbine plant from the ground up? Highly doubt it, probably more expensive though.

              Nuclear base load is an incredibly good strategy though, although nuclear isn’t fossil fuels, so.