• PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It would be the equivalent of 100W LED lighting. Which, when you consider household LEDs typically only emit ~1-2W of light, 100W would be a lot of light.

      They probably meant an LED that is equivalent to a 100W incandescent.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I know. It’s a joke, and I have repaired a work light with two 50W LED modules so I know exactly how much light 100 W of LED lighting emits, and I’m pondering what it would take other technology to correspond to that.

        And the input power of typical E27 household LED bulbs is usually 8-12 W. If one buys a 1-2W LED bulb, they will often find it useless and throw it out (I know because I sift through light bulb bins in shops.)

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Of 100W LED. Amount of light 100W LED would emit.

      Also that video has soviet osciloscope jumpscare.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I know what you meant. I literally named three non-LED devices that emit as much light as a 100W LED, or “equivalents of a 100W LED”.

        • rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Your question didn’t have enough words. Asking “What other kind of light would a 100 watt LED be equivalent to” would have been less ambiguous.

          • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Well, there are only two ways I could have meant it. Of both lighting technologies being referred to here, one is LED from context. Also, no other technology can match 200W fluorescent etc. with 100 W of input power.

            But yeah, I do concede that some puzzle-solving is needed if you’re not familiar with the technology.

            • rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              I don’t think you understand that your comment made it seem like you were the one who misunderstood and didn’t fully read his comment.