Somehow this is the only country on earth where this seems to happen. When talking about shootings involving guns, okay, fine, the US is certainly an outlier there, but every country has cars and police.

This is murder.

  • Envis10n@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    To anyone saying she tried to run over the officer, please watch the body cam footage. She is turning the wheel as much as possible to steer the vehicle away from the officer. On top of that, she pulled forward very slowly. If you were trying to run someone over, you would not give them every opportunity to avoid being hit by the vehicle.

    Stop licking boots

  • cowpowered@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    The hell is wrong with this country. Shoplifting is not violent crime. If they flee put out an arrest warrant and they’ll turn up later, in a lot more trouble.

    Cops are well aware standing in front of a car gives them a free pass killing someone who attempts to escape. It’s totally unnecessary pointless murder.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s totally unnecessary pointless murder.

      It’s an execution. Someone accused of a crime doesn’t get a trial or a chance to defend themselves. Someone with a gun makes a decision to end their life on the spot.

    • Boddhisatva@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Cops are well aware standing in front of a car gives them a free pass killing someone who attempts to escape.

      Not to mention, standing in front of a car driven by a POC who has every reason to expect the cops to shoot them anyway. That person is already frightened and likely panicked and not thinking clearly. Putting yourself in front of a car with a panicked driver who is justifiably in fear for their life is incredibly stupid.

      Also, what is with cops just repeating the same command over and over again and refusing to otherwise interact with the person. Are they trying to make the situation worse? Why not try and de-escalate the situation. Oh, that’s right, they want a reason to shoot people.

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Are they trying to make the situation worse?

        Yes, because it lets them use lethal force like the jack booted thugs they want to be.

    • experbia@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Cops are well aware standing in front of a car gives them a free pass killing someone

      This “technique” has been demonstrated enough that frankly, I think that any rational person would conclude that in any situation where a cop walks in front of your car, you’re better off just gunning it before the cop has a chance to extrajudicially execute you first. If they walk in front of your car, it’s clear they’re just itching to murder you. The threat has been made, you should fear for your life. It’s you or them.

      • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think that any rational person would conclude that in any situation where a cop walks in front of your car, you’re better off just gunning it before the cop has a chance to extrajudicially execute you first.

        Who upvotes this crap? This is worse than reddit.

          • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            If you floor it and run into a cop just because they walk in front of your car, you deserve to get shot because the cop would be defending themselves.

  • Thurgo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I do not understand why it is so common for police in this country to stand in front of a car and then shoot the driver when the car moves. It’s a manufactured danger and really does not seem like a smart idea to use your weapon to put a corpse in control of a heavy machine.

  • ox0r@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Getting shot over shoplifting is insane.

    The usa is fucked beyond saving

  • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    How should this have been handles instead? If she really really doesn’t want to comply, You write down her license place, and you let her go.

    That simple.

    You have her face on video, you have the license plate, it’s trivial to then go visit her at her home and have a talk. Hell, follow her if you have to, but not in a high speed chase. Just keep your distance, let her go where she wants to go until she’s done.

    Worst case scenario, you just let her go.

    This extreme focus on that every petty little thing MUST be stopped, every small time offender MUST comply only ends in this. Suffering.

    Instead focus on fixing poverty and you know, making sure that pregnant women have all they need so that they don’t need to steal? That is why we banned abortion, no? Because we care about babies?

    Oh yeah that’s right. We care about unborn fetuses, but born babies can get fucked.

    Let this woman have an abortion if she can’t afford a baby. Now she doesn’t need to shoplift, at least not for the baby

    Lift people out of poverty. Push people to be better educated. THOSE are things that will actually lower crime rates but then it means they ml o longer are the common pulp that can stand on

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Worth noting that the car didn’t have plates according to the Police.

      Hardly the Police job to solve poverty?

      This 21 Year old has a 6 and 3 year old sons. I’ll let you do the math on that. But it adds up to before some states had bans.

      Regardless. They should not have drawn their guns since she didn’t pose any immediate threat.

      Regardless. Fact of the matter is that the situation only escalated after the police drew their weapons.

      Regardless, her trying to run one of the cops down is only going to end 1 way.

      • ZzyzxRoad@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        This 21 Year old has a 6 and 3 year old sons. I’ll let you do the math on that. But it adds up to before some states had bans.

        First of all, red states made it next to impossible to get abortions even when it was legal. Also, they cost money. Contrary to apparent popular belief, George Soros or the DNC don’t just appear to fund every abortion. Or, sometimes people are Catholic, which is fucking stupid, but maybe there’s some family shit you don’t know about. Especially for a minor trying to get an abortion. Again, contrary to popular belief, they weren’t just being handed out for free on every corner to every 16 year old who wanted one. There were still a million obstacles long before the Dobbs decision.

        Second, “I’ll let you do the math” is a judgey, self-righteous, and gross statement.

        • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago
          1. Abortions are available in ohio. That is what matters here, since the argument being responded to was, “let her have an abortion”.

          2. Are you going to add any anything of worth?

      • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s indeed not the job for the police to solve poverty and I’m sure this woman has her problems.

        None of that excuses what happened. They should never have pulled their guns. That police officer should not have been standing in front of the car. The woman tried to run away, nit murder a cop. The officer was standing in the most dangerous nokace he could, I’m arguing that that was in purpose. “I’ll stand where if you make a move you might kill me, giving me reason to shoot you”

        Even that car not having license plates excuses anything. Then follow her, distantly. She’ll stop somewhere, pick her up there.

        Hell, even letting her go is preferable to this outcome. It doesn’t matter that his woman had kids since she was 15, it’s irrelevant. It doesn’t matter that she is poor, uneducated, it’s all irrelevant.

        The point is that police in the US is horribly educated, and has a terrible culture. They need to be educated for years, not 6 months. They need to get a culture of “we are to protect and serve” instead of “we are Rambo Cowboy”. They need to learn to calm and deescalate every situation they arrive in, not always make shit worse

        • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I already said that they shouldn’t have drawn weapons didn’t I?

          Your story about how they should follow her from a distant and stop her once she gets out is just fantasy. That’s also not where the fault lies.

          Her trying to run one over is vehicular assault at best. Yes. The police stood there on purpose. To make sure she didn’t take off. That’s fine. Dare I say common procedure in multiple countries, not just the US.

          Pretty sure it’s been stated everywhere that their education and work culture is a big problem. I agree. The police conduct that lead up to the shooting was poor. I agree.

          The moment she tries to run one over. It was only going to end 1 way.

          I’m agreeing with you in my first comment so I’m not sure what you’re trying to argue.

          • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Your story about how they should follow her from a distant and stop her once she gets out is just fantasy.

            It’s reality in countries with police officers who had an actual education and training though. Let the “criminals” go for now, pick them up later. In this case, it would have saved two lives.

            • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yes, when it’s deemed that approaching the criminal in public poses an imminent danger to the public.

              Or if they have reason to believe that the Alleged shoplifting is organized, They might hold of to later follow them home and conduct a search of the home for evidence of more stolen items.

              Are suggesting she’s either a danger to the public or part of organized shoplifting?

              • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Or when approaching a SUSPECT (she wasn’t convicted of anything) causes danger to the suspect itself, for example.

                Let’s say that she is mentally ill, just to make the point. Are we going to do the same? Stand in front of the car, she gets a panic attack and just drives without thinking because of me tal illness. Are we going to shoot her too?

                Oh wait, that is what is happening all the time in the USA where innocent civilians with mental illnesses are murdered by police because police in the US isn’t trained to do their job right. This is actual realiti there.

                Again, had these police officers been trained properly, she (and her unborn baby) would still be alive today.

                This is not on her, this is on US police. Again.

                • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  The police should not have drawn weapons.

                  She should not try to run them over. Not sure why that’s a controversial take for you.

  • Lord_McAlister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    So some neckbeard republicans are going to come out and say “She should have just complied”, but honestly what is the absolute worst scinerio if she WAS shop-lifting? In what world is it not a better option to just get her FUCKING CAR’S license-plate number, track her to her house, then arrest her there when she’s clearly cornered? Or just boot her car when it’s found again and force her to come to you to get it off?

    Because now you’ve killed a woman and her unborn baby over some God damn groceries.

    • sab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The headline “Pregnant lady caught shoplifting groceries; arrested” would already be telling of a society that has gone far over the edge.

    • bobman@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Probably not.

      Cops also wouldn’t be held responsible if they killed an innocent bystander.

  • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Actually this would be double murder. Now that fetuses are considered full human beings, remember abortions being murder? This is a double murder.

    Eh, then again I’m sure that because this was a police officer, Republicans wont care. We must obey the police!