• nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Joining the Face Eating Leopard party is a fucking stupid alternative. Pushing for rank choice voting in their local and state elections to normalize 3rd parties is what can change things.

        • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          Not supporting the face nibbling party does not mean you’re joining the face eating party, it means the face nibbling party needs to make real steps to stop nibbling on faces to get your vote back.

          • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            The leopards eat everyone’s face if they win. And in a first past the pole election, sitting out helps them eat all our faces.

          • Frog-Brawler@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            6 months ago

            In a two party system where both options bad, voting against the option that wants to end democracy is your clearest route to one day electing a progressive. Not voting allows for one more vote for the guy that wants to end democracy to not be negated; to which point you’ll never have to concern yourself with voting again.

            • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              Not sure which party you mean is saving democracy. The one suing to keep green party off state ballots, and that refused to primary a candidate with a 33% approval rating, or the other one.

              • Frog-Brawler@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                I’m talking about the party that DID NOT send insurrectionists to the capital to attempt to keep their wanna-be-dictator in power after he lost. I’m talking about the party that does not want to end voting, that has forgiven some student debt, that hasn’t intentionally shifted more wealth to the richest among us, that wants to keep the EPA around so that there might actually be a future.

              • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                Trump, they’re talking about Trump obviously. To read it any other way is disingenuous and if you genuinely think they may have been talking about Biden then you’re delusional.

          • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            This really depends on what you mean by “not supporting” - are you speaking out against them, primarying them, advocating for better policies? I’m with you 100%… the issue is the camp that decides to protest vote Trump or not participate in the general election.

            Our voting system is broken and in the general election your choices are Trump or Biden.

            • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              YOUR choices are Trump or Biden. I refuse to participate in a system that gives me no representation in government.

              The refusal to primary came from the DNC, and our calls to challenge them or push for better policies go unheard

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s not exactly how it works. People could get motivated to run for office and actually start changing the makeup of the Democrats. The leadership we have today stems from a very long of complacency. And our choices may be functionally limited to two groups. Their makeup isn’t so limited.

      • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        There is no changing a system that’s operating as designed. The only effective change will come from dismantling the DNC as a political party and allowing a new party to take its place.

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Spoken like someone either ignorant to how things work. Or vested in them not working.

          • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Anyone with a basic understanding of how it works would oppose it. It’s an abusive good cop/bad cop relationship. In the end they are both cops sworn to uphold the white supremacist laws this country was founded on.