New York City’s largest cop union is suing Police Commissioner Edward Caban and Mayor Adams for implementing a new “zero tolerance” policy on NYPD officers using steroids or other performance-enhancing drugs, the Daily News has learned.

In a lawsuit filed in Manhattan Supreme Court on Friday, lawyers for the Police Benevolent Association alleged the previously undisclosed policy flies in the face of a legal agreement the union entered into with the city in 2011.

The 2011 contract prohibited officers from ingesting or possessing any anabolic steroid or other forms of human growth hormones without a medical prescription. However, the old standard didn’t require officers to run any such prescription by their NYPD district surgeon before starting to use it.

The new protocol — which was enacted on Dec. 26, 2023, and described in an internal memo reviewed by The News as a “zero tolerance drug policy” — beefs up the old rule by affirming that officers must “immediately notify their district surgeon” of any steroid prescription they receive and provide “all supporting medical documentation” to the surgeon backing up the need for the drug.

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    73
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Honestly if I’m going to get into wrestling matches that decide whether I live or die, I’d probably take steroids.

    I wonder what the reaction to this will be. *Whoo. I guess comments must be acab instead of nuanced.

    • halferect@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Are you saying the general public should be juicing so we can survive police attacks?

      • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        The general public don’t usually carry firearms. Police do. Losing a wrestling match comes with the potential threat of your own gun being taken and used against you. That means losing said wrestling match could mean death. This is why people who conceal carry are the most likely to stay the fuck away from trouble like this. Police don’t have that luxury.

        • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          5 months ago

          They actually do have the luxury of standing back. Ask the officers at Uvalde. Ask the Supreme Court.

          De-escalation could also help. But, no, let’s arm these undertrained, ignorant, and stupid…

          • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            No, and I can’t possibly imagine what in my message made you think that. I’m more than happy to live in a country where the only people carrying guns are cops.

            • person420@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              That’s a weird statement. If the police were the only people carrying guns, why would the police need them?

              • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                It’s also the real situation in most of the world there bud. And in the UK, they don’t carry them.

                • person420@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I’m not sure why you’re saying that to me, or better yet what you think I mean? I’m questioning why in the commenters ideal situation only cops would have guns as opposed to nobody.

              • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Because there’s always going to be the occasional criminal that has managed to obtain one too and even if not they may have bladed or blunt melee weapons and tazers and pepper spray are not 100% reliable against them. Also if you’re confronted by a group of thugs you want to be the only one with a gun.

            • halferect@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              Because you said cops wrestling people could lose their guns and get killed so if cops “have” to wrestle people they probably shouldn’t carry guns because then they can’t lose them while attacking people

    • cerement@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      what drugs do you recommend for pissing your pants and hiding?

      EDIT: found it – need to send shipments of tamsulosin to Uvalde …

    • Aolley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      Do you agree that those who are tasked with upholding the law should be allowed to violate that same law with impunity?

      I understand your comment but I don’t see how it could overcome the above question in regard to police officers.

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        The question is not the most dangerous job. The question is how does taking steroids change that. Steroids won’t help an electrician when 50 MV go through him.