• Moneo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    The point is that it doesn’t solve the problem. The problem is one, we don’t have enough housing supply, and two, the housing supply is largely controlled by parasites (big and small) who profit off their ownership.

    Getting rid of landlords solves half the problem but you still have a large group of people who cannot afford to buy homes. You might think that’s good because housing prices will crash but who’s going to build homes when no one can afford to buy them?

    I’m not saying I have all the answers but I know for sure that getting rid of landlords is not a silver bullet solution.

    • Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Well mortgages and rent costs are pretty close these days aren’t they? Its the down payment and closing costs that price people out of buying a home then? Why not take away the down payment requirements so that renters could participate in the buying market. Maybe there can be deals where someone sells you there home for 1-2 years for 50% market rate but they have to give the house back at the end of the term?

      I think the point being made is that this landlord stuff almost rarely works out well these days so why not change?