You’d think midterms would be a great time to get your name out there and run high profile candidates to win House districts led by charlatans…

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    The “get your name out there” idea is the problem.

    For a third party to be successful they’d need to first build a massive grassroots movement behind it. That takes a lot of effort and may not be successful.

    And what happens if you build that grassroots movement but the Democrats say “hey people seem to care a lot about this issue so lets put it on the platform.” Then what if the Dems actually deal with that issue? Well then that grassroots movement was a success! Except the leaders of the movement may not “get their name out there” as their name isn’t on a ballot that everyone sees.

    Basically US third parties are mostly about giving name recognition to a few individuals (who may or may not have brain worms) so they can get on TV and have some notoriety. People voting third party feel like they’re sticking it to someone… when really the people they’re sticking it to don’t have enough votes to do much and the people they’re voting for just want to be on TV.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Pretty much the entire operating philosophy and goal of third parties is wrong.

      Like you’ve said “Getting your name out there” has been a complete failure. I think it’s safe to say at this point that it doesn’t work. If Democrats or Republicans had used it as a strategy, they’d be rightfully dragged.

      The “do well enough to get national funding” goal hasn’t worked either. Ross Perot got 8% with the Reform party, but no ones even heard of that party.

      This is why I consider third parties to just be grifts and scams. Either that, or they’re truly stupid.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Much past very local elections, absolutely. City and maybe county elections don’t have this problem since nobody really cares. It’s an entirely different ball of wax.

      The real problem is making the jump past that into “real” positions.