• Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    “The transgender topic” is already weird as a statement (kinda like “the gay agenda”, it comes off as only considering it as a political statement?), and “clearly promoted by the bourgeoisie” implies it’s bad.

    “As far as […] lgbt flags on government buildings”: it’s… not far at all? Again, weird statement.

    “Biological male” is both wrong for the boxer (she’s cis) and generally used for transphobia (trans women on HRT aren’t biological males by any reasonable definition). It’s also generally conspiratorial.

    Overall it’s not explicitly transphobic or bad to me, but it shows at minimum a very misinformed perspective.

    • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Overall it’s not explicitly transphobic or bad to me, but it shows at minimum a very misinformed perspective.

      Yea that was my impression too. AFAIU, they’re from Europe so there may be a language barrier too. Don’t know how true that is though of course.

      Otherwise, tangentially, as far as all the anti-tankie sentiments that may have been prompted by this are concerned, I’ve only seen good culture from them on trans issues.

      EDIT: and thanks for the reply!