Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2年前Sorry for the inconveniencesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square65linkfedilinkarrow-up1723arrow-down112
arrow-up1711arrow-down1imageSorry for the inconveniencesh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2年前message-square65linkfedilink
minus-squarehydrospanner@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·2年前Relevant username. That thing is nowhere near 2.5" dia.
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2年前I googled for 50 mm. That should be close enough.
minus-squareFilthyShrooms@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2年前2.5 inches is 635 mm. Thats much closer to 50 cm
minus-squareFilthyShrooms@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2年前I am often incorrect. Today is one of those days
minus-squareSnipingNinja@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2年前That doesn’t sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm
Relevant username.
That thing is nowhere near 2.5" dia.
I googled for 50 mm. That should be close enough.
Relevant username
2.5 inches is 635 mm. Thats much closer to 50 cm
1 inch is 25,4 mm, not 254 mm.
I am often incorrect. Today is one of those days
That doesn’t sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm
Lol, 2.5 inches is over 2 feet?