A transgender woman from Australia has won a discrimination case against a women-only social media app, after she was denied access on the basis of being male.
The Federal Court found that although Roxanne Tickle had not been directly discriminated against, she was a victim of indirect discrimination - which refers to when a decision disadvantages a person with a particular attribute - and ordered the app to pay her A$10,000 ($6,700; £5,100) plus costs.
It’s a landmark ruling when it comes to gender identity, and at the very heart of the case was the ever more contentious question: what is a woman?
In 2021, Tickle downloaded “Giggle for Girls”, an app marketed as an online refuge where women could share their experiences in a safe space, and where men were not allowed.
Please show me where in the article it says it was a dating website.
I’ll wait.
I’m not saying it was a dating website? I’m saying wouldn’t the exact same thing apply to dating sites??
So you used a false equivalency then?
What are you talking about? You realise case law has far reaching implications right?
Well obviously you weren’t the judge so maybe you don’t know all the facts that were presented in court.
Besides, a dating website is much different than a website one goes to find friends of the same gender.
Are you not capable of reading your own article?