An artist who infamously duped an art contest with an AI image is suing the U.S. Copyright Office over its refusal to register the image’s copyright.

In the lawsuit, Jason M. Allen asks a Colorado federal court to reverse the Copyright Office’s decision on his artwork Theatre D’opera Spatialbecause it was an expression of his creativity.

Reuters says the Copyright Office refused to comment on the case while Allen in a statement complains that the office’s decision “put me in a terrible position, with no recourse against others who are blatantly and repeatedly stealing my work.”

  • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    That douche punched a sentence into a computer and thinks he’s an artist? My god what have we become.

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 minutes ago

      Dude just pointed a camera, pressed click and thinks he’s an artist? My god what have we become. We could take that train of thought all the way to “if you’re not grinding up your own pigments and painting on cave walls you’re not really an artist”.

      AI is a tool. I don’t have an issue with someone using AI and calling themselves an artist, as long as they’ve generated the AI model based on their own previous art. You teach a machine to mimic your brush strokes and color palette and then the machine spits out images as you taught it. I don’t see an issue there because you might as well have painted them yourself, it just saves time to have AI do most (if not all) of the work.

      Problems arise when the AI is based on someone else’s work and you claim the output as yours. Could you have painted the image exactly the same way?

      • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 minutes ago

        Ahh yes, the camera bullshit. Here we go…

        Yes a photographer is an artist. They need to know light diffusion, locational effects, distance and magnification, aperture, shutter speed, and have a subject prepped and able to take direction. They also have to have an insane understanding of post process editing.

        They don’t simply type a sentence into a computer and get beautiful photographs.

        A child can produce the exact same image by simply typing the exact same sentence into a computer.

        A child cannot be given a camera and be tasked to produce the exact same quality photo of a professional photographer- and succeed.

        So stop with this bullshit comparison. It’s apples and oranges.

        • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 minutes ago

          Did you read the rest of the comment or did you stop after the first sentence?

          • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            42 seconds ago

            I didn’t need to. The moment photography was brought up as a comparison, that’s all I needed to know.

            AI is not art. Period.