This did not begin with you engaging in good faith with what I said, lol. As I said originally, I (clearly correctly) interpreted you as having a defensive posturing, not one showing any interest in understanding. It has only been downhill from there. At this point your comments are just word salad and attempts at quips and insults. You have no actual replies to what I say, so you are also inventing things and using terms that you don’t understand incorrectly.
I invite you to show me some of this “rational person”. I assume that such a person has no need for straw men and pretending to know words just because they sound like a good zinger. I assume that such a person can directly address what I say rather than being evasive.
Do you often find this to be an effective debate tactic?
Lying about what I said, spreading, disinformation, and mischaracterizing and ignoring everything you don’t like and what happened is certainly not engaging in good faith. Why should anyone believe what you say?
Pretending that I’m the one who’s been doing everything you have (especially when everyone can see these comments) and your constant psychological projection certainly is not anything but bad faith.
A dishonest misquote, aping of my language without any substance behind it. Absurd straw men. Not addressing a single thing that I said.
And all because I say you should be against genocide and should work against genociders, not support them. This truly broke something in you, didn’t? It’s a shame it has only led to doubling down and dishonest behavior.
I will acknowledge this repeated bad faith behavior as an admission that you cannot respond any further in this particular comment chain. I’m sure you will respond with some more dishonest word salad and you are welcome to it.
This did not begin with you engaging in good faith with what I said, lol. As I said originally, I (clearly correctly) interpreted you as having a defensive posturing, not one showing any interest in understanding. It has only been downhill from there. At this point your comments are just word salad and attempts at quips and insults. You have no actual replies to what I say, so you are also inventing things and using terms that you don’t understand incorrectly.
I invite you to show me some of this “rational person”. I assume that such a person has no need for straw men and pretending to know words just because they sound like a good zinger. I assume that such a person can directly address what I say rather than being evasive.
Alas.
Do you often find this to be an effective debate tactic?
Lying about what I said, spreading, disinformation, and mischaracterizing and ignoring everything you don’t like and what happened is certainly not engaging in good faith. Why should anyone believe what you say?
Pretending that I’m the one who’s been doing everything you have (especially when everyone can see these comments) and your constant psychological projection certainly is not anything but bad faith.
A dishonest misquote, aping of my language without any substance behind it. Absurd straw men. Not addressing a single thing that I said.
And all because I say you should be against genocide and should work against genociders, not support them. This truly broke something in you, didn’t? It’s a shame it has only led to doubling down and dishonest behavior.
Is this the “rational person” you referred to?
Removed by mod
I will acknowledge this repeated bad faith behavior as an admission that you cannot respond any further in this particular comment chain. I’m sure you will respond with some more dishonest word salad and you are welcome to it.
Removed by mod