• kersploosh@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Major League baseball does it, too. The sports leagues are for-profit entertainment companies that generate content. They can choose to license their content to whichever broadcaster or streaming service they like. It’s a poor way to treat their fans, but there is no legal reason they can’t do it.

    Imagine a movie studio films movie in your city, using local actors and crew. They are not required to show the movie on local broadcast TV in your city just because they produced it there.

    • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I get that they look for profit, that makes sense. It would be fine if the local people would be able to watch the matches using the NBA live stream subscription, like the rest of the people in the country do.

      What doesn’t make sense to me is that everyone in the country paying the NBA live subscription can watch the matches of that team, except the people living close.

      Imagine a movie studio films movie in your city, using local actors and crew. They are not required to show the movie on local broadcast TV in your city just because they produced it there.

      If I get the analogy right, it would like if they would prevent the movie from being shown on Netflix subscription because I live to close to where the movie is shot, while the rest of the country can watch it normally. That would be wild.

      Or am I missing something?

      • Gingerlegs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        You’re correct, the original “reason” for the blackout many, many years ago was to retain the local ticket sales for the team and the potential tourism to the city.

        Edit: most leagues honor an “if it sells out, then we don’t blackout” policy