Semantics.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    9 months ago

    Well, there will be more than enough signed statements and other written communication to prove the contrary, I’m sure.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s actually better if he sticks to that claim, that means he can’t claim any communications with her were privileged and thus inadmissible.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        His claims will change to whatever he thinks is most advantageous in the moment.

        If you present evidence of him claiming the contrary he’ll just say he never said that.