Not at all, but Iād say we donāt really remember ancient kings either. We might remember the effect they had on the world, or some particularly unusual characteristic that was recorded for posterity, but Iād say that once the last person who knew them dies, we can no longer remember āthemā, so much as witness a sort of āshellā of ideas about them.
We donāt remember what they sounded like, or smelt like, how they smiled or what they said to their nearest and dearest. We donāt really know much about them as people compared to the king that became their shell. The things that made them unique people are gone when the last person who experienced them dies, so Iād say we really donāt remember them as people, even if we do remember the ākingā or ācopper merchantā.
Is that really that different from an ancient king?
Not at all, but Iād say we donāt really remember ancient kings either. We might remember the effect they had on the world, or some particularly unusual characteristic that was recorded for posterity, but Iād say that once the last person who knew them dies, we can no longer remember āthemā, so much as witness a sort of āshellā of ideas about them.
We donāt remember what they sounded like, or smelt like, how they smiled or what they said to their nearest and dearest. We donāt really know much about them as people compared to the king that became their shell. The things that made them unique people are gone when the last person who experienced them dies, so Iād say we really donāt remember them as people, even if we do remember the ākingā or ācopper merchantā.