I’m not sure Microsoft did this generation of consoles any favours by launching the Series S.

  • lorty@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Developers can shit on series S as much as they want, but if Microsoft relax the feature parity it would be a death sentence for the series S.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      More of a death sentence than games just not coming to Xbox?

      They could just run the game on xCloud for certain titles.

      • lorty@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        They could just run the game on xCloud for certain titles.

        Not a bad idea honestly.

        • MrLuemasG@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Except you’d have to be always online to play it that way, and forcing always online as the only way to play is a huge part of what killed the Xbox One. It wouldn’t surprise me if Xbox isn’t ready to try and push that again (as the only option, they’re obviously fine having it be AN option on their console)

  • EarthlingHazard@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I have a feeling all of these complaints about supporting the Series S will disappear once the Switch successor releases and devs have a new console with weaker specs to complain about

  • Spuddlesv2@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    The Series S specs exceed all the listed minimum specs on the BG3 Steam page for PC. How is the Series S holding anything back when they apparently support their game on shittier PCs?

    • magic_lobster_party@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The problem is that they have couch coop play. They struggle making it work with Series S. From what I understand, they cannot just make a separate version without coop just for Series S. All game features in Series X must also be available on Series S. I guess that’s a limitation imposed by Microsoft.

      With PC you don’t have that limitation. If your computer can’t do couch coop then too bad for you. Minimum specs probably doesn’t account for coop.

      I’m not sure why they don’t remove couch coop completely from the Xbox versions. Probably because they think it’s removing too much of their vision of the game.

      • teft@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        So because 5 people on the face of the planet don’t want to use the internet like modern humans the rest of us have to suffer? When was the last time anyone actually used couch coop? It was Halo 2 for me.

        • Nighed@sffa.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          A lot of people would love to have more split screen co-op (or Vs) games.

          Its stupid that if I have a friend round I cant play a multiplayer game with them.

        • h3rm17@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I constantly use it. I play with my partner, not with randos on the internet, not with friends. We live in the same house. We already bought 2 copies on PC to support the devs, but being forced to do so would be a shitty move. Also, when we have friends over, we do not expect them to bring their own PCs and shit if we want to game. Couch coop is where it’s at.

    • Dum@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      It may be due to Microsoft demanding certain minimum configurations: at the very least minimum resolution and minimum frame rate. On PC you can always go down to 240p and/or live with 10fps in very high density scenes. Microsoft can (and will) just say “no” if they try that on the Xbox S

      • Spuddlesv2@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I understand that but surely the articles should be “developers lie about minimum specs on PC” surely. I believe the concept of a lower priced and accessible console should be encouraged. If that means developers have to try a little harder to support people who buy a cheaper console then so be it.

        • Dum@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          I guess that’s debatable, depends on how you define what “it runs” means. PC gamers with dated hardware may be fine with playing on 1080p, while on the Xbox Microsoft might veto if it doesn’t run on 1440p and 30fps. Of course weaker hardware won’t run everything faster hardware can, you can’t just sprinkle infinite magic optimization dust on a game, there are simply limits what’s possible with weaker hardware, and once you’ve reached them you can’t just shout “enhance” like in CSI Miami.

          • Spuddlesv2@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            So MS enforcing a level of quality is a good thing then. The alternative is 12 fps at 720p.