While Blizzard is very much focussed on its big money-makers like its various Warcraft games, from WoW to Hearthstone to Warcraft Rumble, as well as Diablo and the much-maligned Overwatch 2, he’s still open to StarCraft making a comeback. That said, RTS fans shouldn’t get their hopes up. While the series might return, that doesn’t necessarily mean it will be an RTS, and whatever shape it takes will depend on the person or team who goes to bat for it.

“It’s not me saying, ‘Go make a StarCraft game,’” Ybarra told Bloomberg. “I need to have someone who has the vision and passion that comes with the idea, and I’ll bet on that team.”

A vision and passion he - according to his own words - clearly does not have. 😑

  • loo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The good days of Blizzard are over, I’m not getting my hopes up for anything they produce nowadays.

    • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ll keep an ear to the ground.

      But I don’t like that $90 preorder logic at all, it’s almost weird it exists.

      I try to imagine going to a gamestop and a gaming associate was like, buy that game 3 days later and I’ll give you $20.

      Skip the in game pet and mount, that most people forget exists after the expansion, and I’ll make that $40

      But then… why does this system exist?!

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        Early access is the new fad, because it costs nothing and has value to some players. The increasing drive for more monetization is Activision’s influence, Blizzard was really lazy about it before being bought.

        At least early access makes a little sense in an mmo. The new areas are super crowded on launch, so letting some get through early does help.

      • Syndic@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        But then… why does this system exist?!

        Because it works and makes them money! You can bet that other publishers will take notice and you’ll see such money grabbing schemes becoming more and more common.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not to mention that, to some, seeing you ride that mount or that pet following you tells them that you’re a sucker who pre-ordered the game.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      When I was playing through the campaign of the last SC2 expansion I couldn’t help seeing the story/dialogue through the lens of, Artanis = how Blizzard executives think of themselves. Was really bad IMO

    • Dicska@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I still have Diablo II Resurrected added to my Steam Library as “Blizzard’s remaining dignity”. And even that is because it’s made by Blizzard North. Apart from maybe WoW (at least the golden years, not necessarily the current state), I can’t think of anything else that has kept its perceived value.

      • loo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        I remember when Overwatch came out. It was so damn fun. Then they ruined it with patches and finally deleted it, only for it to be replaced by that shitty money making machine “Overwatch 2”. It’s kinda sad to know that some games can’t be experienced now in the same way they were when they first came out. Same with WoW.

        • ANGRY_MAPLE@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          It feels like it’s been ages since I’ve played WoW.

          I remember the days of the spiffworld youtube videos, where Jonathan Coulton songs were played in the background while WoW characters dancing/acting along to the lyrics.

  • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    that doesn’t necessarily mean it will be an RTS, and whatever shape it takes will depend on the person or team who goes to bat for it.

    So… it’s not Starcraft, then. It’s just another game.

    • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      8 months ago

      You know how in Starcraft, Infestors could take over a unit and parade it around to do its bidding?

      It sounds kind of like that, but with the Starcraft brand.

    • ono@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      So… it’s not Starcraft, then.

      I think Starcraft has enough story and character development by now that its identity is more than just the mechanics that it started with.

      It’s just another game.

      It would still be a Starcraft game. If we were to ignore the lore and only consider the RTS format, then even the first Starcraft was “just another game”. Those mechanics weren’t unique or new.

      Similarly, World of Warcraft is still a Warcraft game, even though it’s hung on a different framework from the original.

      • Knusper@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I think Starcraft has enough story and character development by now that its identity is more than just the mechanics that it started with.

        I can imagine that, but I don’t think anyone but RTS fans know that.
        I feel like, if they want to ‘bring it back’ as a brand, they would need to do an RTS game with all the marketing and such, to please the fans and bring it back into the public’s memory, and then they could follow it up with a non-RTS spinoff.

        If they don’t do it like this, they’ll likely have another debacle like with Diablo Immortals, where fans are waiting for a full-fledged title in that series and they’re announcing something that’s just not that.

        • EssentialCoffee@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I mean Warcraft was originally an RTS. No one thinks about that now.

          A StarCraft game in the vein of Mass Effect would be dope.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Would you claim if Starcrft ghost had not been canceled, it would not be a starcrft game?

    • Chozo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      8 months ago

      StarCraft doesn’t have to be at RTS, you know.

      RTS is a dead genre, but that doesn’t mean the SC universe has to die with it.

      • hyperhopper@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        WTF does “dead genre” mean? There are still people that love it and play it and want more.

        The people shouting at blizzcon aren’t yelling because they need a new model and voice lines for protoss units, they are doing it because they want another RTS

        • Chozo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          StarCraft hasn’t seen any significant development since 2015. There aren’t many other competitors in the RTS space since about that time, as well.

          C&C hasn’t had anything since 2010. AoE’s last major entry was in 2021 and had a pretty weak reception. I can’t think of the last RTS that actually sold well and has large adoption besides SC2.

          It’s a very niche genre these days, and few developers are willing to make them in today’s climate of looters, extractions, and battle royales. RTS games just simply aren’t making the waves they used to anymore.

          • Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 months ago

            Ye, and Stormgate and Zero Space don’t exist, and people aren’t excited for either, am I rite?

            • Chozo@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              8 months ago

              This thread is literally the first time I’ve heard of either of those.

              • Maalus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                8 months ago

                Then you don’t follow RTS news at all. Stormgate is made by ex blizzard employees that made Starcraft. Zero Space is made by Starcraft pros and modders. Zero Space got funded incredibly well through kickstarter. Both of these are a return to Warcraft 3 / Starcraft 2 type of gameplay and a lot of people are waiting for their release.

          • Grangle1@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Crusader Kings, Europa Universalis, Civilization, Total War… Not all necessarily “real time”, but still very much in the grand strategy mold.

      • AustralianSimon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        The next Total Annihilation is going to be balls to the wall good. Check the trailers.

        Storm Gate and Zero Space are being made by ex Blizz staff. Both in alpha.

        RTS is back on the menu, boys.

    • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, let’s not forget that Blizzard was bought by Activision and Activision was just bought by Microsoft.

      There is no “Blizzard”, just Microsoft.

      • Halosheep@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        I genuinely have more faith in Microsoft than Activision.

        I don’t have any empirical evidence, but for some reason I do.

  • Artyom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    8 months ago

    The next Starcraft game will be a MOBA BR because that’s the most soulless thing we could think of and it’s our best bet to boost shareholder confidence.

    • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      Idk, I always thought Starcraft: Ghost sounded promising. Actually being able to participate in one of the battles seemed pretty cool to me. Of course, the devil is usually in the details.

      • BURN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Prior to this thread I had never even heard of the ghosts project. Definitely could be cool, but I’d guess that’s almost a completely separate market than the RTS fans

  • Grangle1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Why do I feel like this is gonna just be M$/Activi$ion/Blizzard going, “Hey look at Starfield, we have a sci-fi thing, let’s copy Starfield with our sci-fi IP”.

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      And I mean, while I can’t see a Starfield-clone work in the Starcraft universe, I could see an adjacent spin-off game work really well like being a cargo-pilot having to drop stuff off on planets during active battles with fire all around you, or an exploration game where you explore galaxies and have to avoid being detected/caught by the zerg and/or protoss.

      But I can’t see the modern Actiblizzking pull that off, even with MS throwing endless money at them.

  • Tronn4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Sounds like under Microsoft it’s going to be a first person shooter :rolls eyes:

    • kogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      To be fair, I reckon a well made SC FPS could be pretty rad if you got to play each species/unit type. Playing as a Zealot or Dark Templar would be awesome.

      • Tronn4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I remember those rumors. Yes that would have good. I think though that almost every game rhat comes out is trying to be the next call of duty or the next fortnight. Run n gun arcade style shooter with goofy guns and gadgets and microtransactioned to hell.

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Blizzard cut their teeth and grew most of their oldest fans on RTS’s, and now don’t want to make more RTS because the average gamer wants to play an arena game, battle royal or rpg. The RTS market is there, investors just don’t see it because RTS tends to be more niche and players putting in more hours overall compared to more casual friendly genres.