why would they choose that over selling him or loaning him with full wages paid?
they want rid, getting rid of the person but still paying him doesnt benefit the team whatsoever. For example. I dont know the % theyre being asked to cover but 50% of Sanchos wage is still more than 80% of players in the league.
Why would anyone pay Jadon what you guys pay him? I think you guys are stuck with his wages until the contract runs out. If anyone takes him it will be on a loan with the majority of wages paid by you. At this point it’s more realistic that ETH is sacked before the end of the season and Jadon can come and play next season.
There is also no reason to pay for sancho whilst he plays for another team when we have a terrible squad depth, if were going to pay for him, were going to make sure he is an option in the event we need him, but will sell him/loan him if it benefits us
ETH likely wont be sacked, they will see him out to the end of the season at least i think
They wouldn’t be paying all his wages right? So it’s a decrease in costs for them
why would they choose that over selling him or loaning him with full wages paid?
they want rid, getting rid of the person but still paying him doesnt benefit the team whatsoever. For example. I dont know the % theyre being asked to cover but 50% of Sanchos wage is still more than 80% of players in the league.
Why would anyone pay Jadon what you guys pay him? I think you guys are stuck with his wages until the contract runs out. If anyone takes him it will be on a loan with the majority of wages paid by you. At this point it’s more realistic that ETH is sacked before the end of the season and Jadon can come and play next season.
There is also no reason to pay for sancho whilst he plays for another team when we have a terrible squad depth, if were going to pay for him, were going to make sure he is an option in the event we need him, but will sell him/loan him if it benefits us
ETH likely wont be sacked, they will see him out to the end of the season at least i think