There is also no reason to pay for sancho whilst he plays for another team when we have a terrible squad depth, if were going to pay for him, were going to make sure he is an option in the event we need him, but will sell him/loan him if it benefits us

ETH likely wont be sacked, they will see him out to the end of the season at least i think

i got the joke mate, don’t worry, not sure the others understood it lol

why would they choose that over selling him or loaning him with full wages paid?

they want rid, getting rid of the person but still paying him doesnt benefit the team whatsoever. For example. I dont know the % theyre being asked to cover but 50% of Sanchos wage is still more than 80% of players in the league.