I think both clubs are in disarray in their own ways. Both have great managers but not idea players. United have good players on paper but who seem to have really poor attitudes and undermine the manager eventually.

Chelsea have spent a lot of money but have a completely new squad who have had little time together and are very raw.

It’s easy to say “Chelsea should because they spent 1bn”. But I am talking about their current squads, manager, board, situation etc

  • FootyBhoy@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    If you asked this a month ago people would say Man U, because chelsea have put up two good performances now all of a sudden people think they are through the shit. Chelsea are still in a bad place.

    • goingforgoals17@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I see your point, but United haven’t put in more than 20 good minutes at a time this season, nevermind an entire performance

      • FootyBhoy@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Both teams are terrible rn don’t get me wrong. But Man U Are still Man U and new ownership could change things. Neither of them are winning it any time soon so that’s good.

        • RancidKiddo@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Man u are still man u, lol! Love this comment! Sounds intelligent but completely ignorant