I think both clubs are in disarray in their own ways. Both have great managers but not idea players. United have good players on paper but who seem to have really poor attitudes and undermine the manager eventually.
Chelsea have spent a lot of money but have a completely new squad who have had little time together and are very raw.
It’s easy to say “Chelsea should because they spent 1bn”. But I am talking about their current squads, manager, board, situation etc
It should be Man udt. Simply because they have the highest wage bill.
But I think Chelsea.
Their owners might not know a lot about football but they at least trying to learn and they know high revenue isn’t a guarantee if they keep underperforming.
Also it seems healthier to be a Chelsea manager than Man Utd ditto.