• starbreaker@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Social media is shit, and will always be shit, because the people who make social platforms are petty authoritarians bent on punishing the world because they didn’t get enough pussy in high school. It is not a substitute for a well-curated collection of RSS feeds.

    • Slow@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately the display of content in different RSS readers is different.

      I understand that RSS is for displaying text and photo information, but the lack of video and audio playback in various app is disappointing.

      In addition, it is often necessary to configure the server part to scan commercial sites. This is something that beginners cannot handle.

      • starbreaker@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately the display of content in different RSS readers is different.

        Why is this a problem? I consider this a strength; choose the reader that works best for you.

        I understand that RSS is for displaying text and photo information, but the lack of video and audio playback in various app is disappointing.

        You know that podcasts are basically RSS feeds with extensions, right?

        In addition, it is often necessary to configure the server part to scan commercial sites.

        Why is this necessary?

        • Slow@lemmy.todayOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The answer to your question. There are news channels that are only on social networks. Or bloggers who publish insider information about new equipment. As far as I know, you can’t do without scraping on the server if you want to receive news from social networks.

          Except for off-the-shelf solutions like Nitter instants.

          • starbreaker@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There are news channels that are only on social networks.

            And you’re better off ignoring them. Corporate news channels are nothing but advertising and propaganda.

            As far as I know, you can’t do without scraping on the server if you want to receive news from social networks.

            Not to be pedantic, but web scraping and port scanning aren’t the same. If you had mentioned scraping before I’d have been content to say that sites that make you scrape instead of providing RSS feeds are run by assholes.

  • swordsmanluke@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    RSS is an aggregation protocol that is

    • distributed
    • pull-oriented
    • self-curated

    This is in contrast to reddit, digg, lemmy, or other aggregator services which are

    • centralized (even if federated)
    • push-oriented
    • public input w/ moderator curation

    Each of these decisions has tradeoffs.

  • indigojasper@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    sometimes the feed aggregator will bypass the paywall for ya 👀

    i also like that reading the articles in my feed reader doesn’t give away any tracking information. can get the same info without visiting the source website at all. and when i do open links there’s no source to show where i opened it from.

    ultimately it’s so much easier having most news sources in one place instead of subscribing to hella newsletters.