• lumpenproletariat@quokk.auBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    140
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The big concern should be DJI having access to cameras and microphones in who knows how many millions of households.

    • whaleross@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      99
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The bigger concern should be that this is how badly coded and how little concern there is about security there is with smart appliances in people’s homes.

      Working as a consultant and seeing the code that runs online services made me realize how fucked up everything is and to accept that nobody knows or cares about what they are doing with other people’s integrity. AI in coding is barely making a dent in it.

      • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s less of a concern over the corporate actors who have infiltrated our houses.

        Even if it was completely secure, they would still have access to this information and that would be by utilised by a state in some capacity against us.

        Every device we have is sending our data to these companies, our homes and streets are full of Orwellian Telescreens surveilling our every move. It’s inescapable and as the means for them to better amalgamate and act on this data increases, the bleaker our future becomes.

        • Bgugi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          Anybody can code an application, it takes a software engineer to barely code it.

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      ‘Company deliberately has control of over 6,700 robot vacuums while selling them to unsuspecting general public’

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    You don’t have to be smart to use a broom but you have to be stupid to buy a vacuum with microphone and camera.

  • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Shame they didn’t get access to the analytics. It would be very interesting to see the extent these data collected are used.

    For instance, training voice AI on customer data. Or voice printing to make a location map of users and selling that data. Or customizing ads that show up on their devices based on what’s in the home, etc etc

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      Why is any of this connected to a spinning turbine sucking air into a filter bag? We have collectively failed as a society, instead of building a leisure society, we build a society of useless over-engineered gadgets programmed by people driving to the office for no reason while being told to reduce our carbon emissions.

      • wabasso@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I hate when someone’s house has an Alexa or whatever and I either have to accept it’s listening to me, or spend social credit asking if they can turn it off when I’m there (I’ve never actually made that request).

  • Bazell@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I have some suggestions about how their security engineer’s routine looks like:

  • mcv@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why are they collecting this data in the first place? You can’t mishandle data you don’t have. The fact that remote access to video is even possible, is very alarming.