• AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is hard because yes dogs are awesome.

    But so are cows, and pigs.

    I’m no vegan, but It’s interesting that the revulsion line for so many is dogs rather than fellow land mammals, land creatures, or something more distinct than a mammal you find particularly cute.

    I’d argue the moral judgment here largely comes from people who just plain abstain from pointing that same moral judgment to sentient creatures they do eat. A cow or a pig is no less an individual than a dog.

    As for me, I am eagerly awaiting lab grown meat becoming more available as an end to our species’ barbarism. Usually all I hear back is disgust at the concept. Give it a chance, for the sake of all the creatures we breed to torture and kill. If we can grow animal protein that tastes the same, that’s a win for everyone.

    • gullible@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We bred dogs specifically to love people and to be expressive in an innately human way, so it feels wrong to kill them. Cows, pigs, chickens, sheep, etc. were bred for food. There’s less betrayal if the idea was always to eat them.

      • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Cows are not bred only to supply meat, they supply labor to till fields and provide manure for crops. The dog breeds used for food in those regions are bred specifically for food, no different than current domesticated animals. Its the lack of that understanding and diminishing the work that other domesticated animals do that cause the problem. Hell there are plenty of studies that show pigs are smarter than dogs, we use them for organ transplants and stuff. You can legitamately argue pigs are more innately human than dogs are.

        • gullible@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pigs don’t have expressive faces, built-in emotional understanding of humans, and, most importantly, infinite affection. Horses supplanted cows as farm… workhorses, which severely altered our perception of them in the west. It’s a marketing issue.

          • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Emphasis on the west. In eastern culture, cows are still used (e.g cows in india are considered sacred). Hell, an example of a cow that was originally not bred for consumption is the wagyu, a highly sought after piece of meat. But of course, as westerners, apparently we disregard that fact…

            • gullible@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              In 1868, Englishman Edward Charles Kirby established the first slaughterhouse in Kobe, and in 1869, a sukiyaki restaurant called “Gekka-tei” opened in Kobe.

              TIL

          • masquenox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Pigs don’t have expressive faces,

            Yes, they do.

            built-in emotional understanding of humans

            No, they don’t.

            • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think some dogs do but not all breeds. Some dogs are dumb as shit but still awesome in their own way.

      • penguin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        What does betrayal have to do with the morality of killing something?

        It’s either right or wrong to kill something if you don’t have to for survival.

        If you think killing dogs is wrong, then killing cows or pigs should also be wrong.

        • 474D@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think it’s unfair to say there’s a spectrum to this. I’m not going to feel as bad with an ant dying compared to a dog

          • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not sure that an ant is relevant to this discussion, since it’s not really similar to a cow, pig, dog, cat, etc.

          • penguin@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I agree. I still eat shrimp and some fish. The fish bother me, but not enough to stop eating them, and the shrimp don’t bother me cause they’re basically underwater crickets.

            For example killing an elephant is worse than killing a chicken. And everyone draws the line somewhere already (unless you’re fine with eating endangered animals and even cannibalism). It’s just where does your own morality draw the line at what level of creature it’s ok to ask to die for your next meal?

        • gullible@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re talking about morality and I’m considering people’s feelings, however convoluted they might be. It’s not a moral issue, it’s marketing.

            • gullible@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Your food and clothing likely involved slavery directly and murder by less than a degree of separation, you goober. Yes, it’s a marketing issue.

              • penguin@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Clothing doesn’t require the death of anyone the same way eating meat does.

                One it’s possible to be cruelty free, and the other is not.

                Also, if I knew for a fact that a company committed acts of evil, I would avoid them as best I could, just like I do with meat.

                Complaining that eating meat is not actually wrong, it’s just marketing, is just a laughable way to look at ethics and empathy.

                Lastly, whataboutism is a joke of a defence.

                • gullible@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You’ve said quite a bit to this vegetarian-since-you-were-an-egg that I processed well over a decade ago. I want you, if you don’t mind, to read my other replies and to reread the question I responded to. And with the most belabored sigh that you can imagine, can I say please?

      • ElcaineVolta@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I really appreciate your usage of the word “betrayal” here, I think it’s incredibly apt.
        but do you think this makes any moral difference? or that it would matter at all to the being having their throat slashed or thrashing in a gas chamber?

        • gullible@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not really, I’m vegetarian out of preference but I get where people come from. I’ve offered the truth of the matter, irrespective of my feelings on it.

      • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s more. Your farm goat is your friend. That wild goat you caught as a baby will be more like a wolf than a dog. The point is really that we didn’t just breed cows to be fatter than previous cows, but also to be nicer to humans just like dogs.

    • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I made a comment like that to my younger sister when I was just out of high school and you’d think that I had just burned the Bible in front of my father or something.

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’d argue the moral judgment here largely comes from people who just plain abstain from pointing that same moral judgment to sentient creatures they do eat. A cow or a pig is no less an individual than a dog.

      so the issue isn’t whether cows or dogs are individuals.

      • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This issue is about that, as people are upset about cruelty to dogs but just put blinders on for cows.

        No person anyone would consider sane would advocate on behalf of saving watermelons, as they have no emotions like fear or sense of self-preservation. Most westerners know intimately that dogs do, but we choose not to dwell on the similar plight of cows, mostly because of the long standing tradition of eating cows. Tradition as always is an idiot thing.

        So yeah, the issue here does revolve around these creatures being sentient individuals, and our erratic recognition of that among the species we choose to consume.

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This issue is about that, as people are upset about cruelty to dogs but just put blinders on for cows.

          the distinguishing characteristic isn’t necessarily the individuality of each, and given that you’re right that there is no appreciable difference in that regard, there must be some other factor at play.

      • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Doesn’t taste nearly as good, doesn’t satiate the pallette. And yes I’ve tried all the impossibles and faux stuff multiple times because I like to try new things.

        That said, I’m completely for alternative routes to meat, and will give them every opportunity as they mature to break my bad habit. Plant based meat just isn’t an adequate nicotine patch for such things, at least not yet.

        • ElcaineVolta@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          it really snaps into view when you think about it as an addiction; which also just so happens to be fueling and unfathomably cruel bundle of industries that is destroying the planet - so the stakes are pretty high here.
          I would encourage people to try veganuary this year, it’s growing massively and there’s tons of support.

          • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean couldn’t you argue that anything that gives enjoyment be considered an addiction then. I mean thats sort of the function of seratonin.

        • penguin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I hear you. I don’t eat meat, and I haven’t for several years. I still find it extremely tempting sometimes to eat some chicken wings.

          The only reason I don’t is because whenever I actually think, “maybe I should just have some,” I get overwhelmed with flashes in my mind visualizing the deaths of the chickens and then I just… can’t.

          But if those flashes weren’t there I definitely would’ve caved by now.

    • interceder270@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Case and point: affluent white women go goo-goo gah-gah over doggies so Westerners immediately revere them above other animals.

      It’s cognitive dissonance at its finest, but I don’t expect more from meat-eaters.