Constructive dismissal. Yes it is, there are some grounds as other comments have explained.

Explain in detail what the charges are and evidence for those charges, please.

Appeal that it was change in workplace conditions without adequate compensation. Unemployment with backpay

going after political opponents

are the same party.

It must be a cobweb of bullshit in your head. You’re right about the application of law being unequal, but not in the way you meant it chief.

This is a prime case for the abolition of intellectual property rights.

You think there is no authority in anarchist government? Have you ever read about horizontal-democracies?

Anarchist just means “against coercive authorities” namely “centralized and hierarchical governance”

You realize the fediverse that creates lemmy is an anarchist structure right?

Join your local SRA today!

Been saying for a while we need a new Blank Panther party for LGBT+ community, like a Pride Demons party.

If you were genuinely asking then apologies for the misunderstanding. Yet the question is one of those “you are prolife? You support killing babies?” type situations.

I never mentioned Hamas or said they also are acting in good faith, as that isnt the topic called into question.

Hamas acting in good faith has nothing to do with this. They aren’t the one making claims.

Israel is the one making the claims here, and the question is if they are making the claim in good faith or trying to justify their genocidal campaign against Palestine.

It smells like propaganda and Israel has been doing nothing but fishing for an excuse to justify their “retaliation” efforts, especially with the backlash from other countries.

If you were genuinely asking then apologies for the misunderstanding. Yet the question is one of those “you are prolife? You support killing babies?” type situations.

I never mentioned Hamas or said they also are acting in good faith, as that isnt the topic called into question.

Hamas acting in good faith has nothing to do with this. They aren’t the one making claims.

Israel is the one making the claims here, and the question is if they are making the claim in good faith or trying to justify their genocidal campaign against Palestine.

It smells like propaganda and Israel has been doing nothing but fishing for an excuse to justify their retaliation, especially with the backlash from other countries.

Plenty if you study history and anthropology. How do you think humans lived for millenia before the invention of currency? You do realize thousands of years separate that from advent of trade and long after we settled down to form permanent communities?

Yyp. I 100% could have been a Amnesia streamer during the rise if Pewds and Markiplier. I was funny as fuck to watch get the shit scared out of. My friends all loved watching me play.

Nice try putting words in my mouth.

Isreal after the Hamas attack lies about beheaded babies to garner international sympathy.

Israel has bombed over 800+ civilians, 40% of which are women and children, within the past week, totalling to more casualties than Ukraine in their conflict with Russia, a year long conflict, in the span of one week.

In a just society these would be allowed to relieve all cashiers from their positions to pursue their passions.

But we must slave away to justify our existence because a few rich fucks don’t want to share and established that mindset as the cornerstone of society.

I just wanted to wail into the void about automation and how our loves could be so much better if people would just lose the chains already.

except the actual wolf is just across the border, launching rockets into civilian areas.

You do know that Israel has been doing this exact thing to Palestine for decades right?

I’m sorry I it is bs saying Israel isn’t the aggressor. Which side has more civilian casualties again in this decades long conflict?

If both parties are both acting in good faith, but Israel has been doing nothing but making excuses for its wholesale genocide. Their actions make their credibility suspect.

Oh man this brought me back to when I was happy. I miss being able to make music :,)

And climate change is an apocalypse for all, which without revolution, we are on a crash course for.

And climate change is an apocalypse for all, which without revolution, we are on a crash course for.

Objectively looking at our system of economics and governance has proven to not take the interests and plights of the people seriously, and is routinely highjacked by special interests to further their wealth and power at the expense of the working class and global environment.

If no fundamental change is made then …

millions will die.

And those in power will write it off as an acceptable cost of doing business. They already have.

That isn’t a hypothetical. That is the reality of climate change on our current trajectory that our current systems fail to accept and do something about.

So to answer your question, there is no alternative people are trying to speak of. Our society is already crumbling and it is not salvageable.

So we have a choice not about alternatives, but on if ending it now would mitigate casualties as opposed to letting the train derail naturally.

At least if we willingly make effort to change we can have some control of the situation in favor of the working class or at least have solace we died on our feet than on our knees