![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/ThV9vrcsDO.png)
Yes, and also build trains instead of EVs
cartographer
Yes, and also build trains instead of EVs
Externalisimg costs is classic strategy
Various Powered by the Apocalypse games do include player initiated exposition
Do we not turn off our electronic devices to save electricity?
Other differences include;
We need to shrink the legal maximum vehicle width
I hope so, but every time I check the latest peak oil prediction it has been pushed further into the future
Or a “helpful” Israeli citizen created it, and the government exploited the opportunity
I go Bushwalking/ overnight hikes as a hobby. Inventory management is very important when you carry everything you need to survive in your pack. When I started rp-ing it took me a while to adjust to the fact that the same people who are hyper-fixated in the “reality” of Spell effects could not be bothered to pack a tent. Though I admit that the DM did not care about tents either…
Does this do the same thing as gnucash?
How much monetary support does Israel receive compared to how much does it earn from exports? I’m looking up their industries and Israel is into diamond cutting, which carries its own ethical issues
If we want an economy with a floor, so no-one is living in poverty, then we also need a ceiling.
They could have done it because of his name, but just not admitted it, or given no reason at all. Systemic racism is hard to prove, which means it can be remarkably persistent
And are there consequences?
Yes the proposed change to the constitution lacked detail, but that is entirely in keeping with the constitution as a whole, it is a “high-level” document after all. The detail would have come in the legislation that enacted it, with plenty of public consultation and discussion in parliament, no different to any other legislation. In its final form it would have probably looked a lot like previous advisory bodies that we used to have, with the critical difference being that it could not be disbanded just because the government of the day didn’t like it.
It is straight from the neoliberal privatisation playbook. Defund public infrastructure until the public complains, then “fix it” by privatising it
Actual management strategy is “you don’t know what your boundaries are until you push against them”
I doubt that the masks had anything to do with it. If someone reacts so violently to being asked to adjust their mask, they will react violently to practically anything.
Does China have capital flight laws? Can they allow the millionaires to leave whilst retaining the actual material wealth?