You can scream to the heavens that you’re an anarchist all you want, but you can’t make people accept that or humor you by also calling you one.
that’s a strange occupation, to care about people calling you anarchist or not.
i know that nowadays people are more interested in what they’re called, appropriated identities, labels and what not, but you really think that those unfrequentables will care about what you call them?
were you posting ai-generated modified images?
not all instances, and communities are ok with that. Some are openly hostile to anything ai
anarchists do have rules, they just don’t have hierarchies. the idea that anarchism is a free-for-all, do whatever you want ideology is capitalist propaganda.
there are many “anarchisms” and some actually refuse rules.
some are clearly antisocial and nihilistic. That doesn’t make it less anarchist.
no place for a racist maga billionaire in your list?
Why would I listen to you then, someone fine with lying. Your words are worthless.
i’m not “fine with lying”'.
Trump is the ultimate liar. Are his words worthless? His lies matter more than our thousand truths.
World has changed and the truth doesn’t matter anymore.
But my original comment was about the frailty of being just a witness to a genocide faraway and asking if the image is real or not. Honestly, what difference does it make after all we’ve seen? What have we done after seeing other images that were authenticated?
yes! i’m there right now
Do you need to install Google Play services to use that one?
no. Nor do you need a boogle account.
Some people seem to have some concerns about Aurora as well
I’ve never read any concerns about aurora. What are they?
aurora gives you the option to “save app bundle”
which they probably already have. Look at that list, and that’s only France ☞ https://bonjourlafuite.eu.org/
you must be young, very young
is there a tv in front of your bed or is that an open window?
The act, which would be enforced starting on July 1, was set to force the New England colonies to solely trade with Great Britain. Later that month, on July 20, an additional rule preventing fishing in the North Atlantic would be enforced. The Prime Minister of Great Britain, Frederick, Lord North, was hoping to make peace by also introducing the Conciliatory Proposition to Parliament on the same day. This would allow colonists to give money to Great Britain voluntarily, rather than through taxes. However, peace would not be achieved, as North had already ordered General Thomas Gage to head to Concord, Massachusetts, to seize military equipment. The plan also included arresting John Hancock and Samuel Adams. These orders arrived in Boston before the Conciliatory Proposition, leading to the first battle of the Revolutionary War at Concord Bridge.
🤷
it may be helpful to stop pretending that in 2026 truth matters.
what does it matter to the people suffering in Gaza this “opportunity to sway the opinions of those around us towards the truth”. Can our swayed opinions change anything for them?
- But not every leisured aristocrat becomes bored and demoralized. For example, the emperor Hirohito, instead of sinking into decadent hedonism, devoted himself to marine biology, a field in which he became distinguished. When people do not have to exert themselves to satisfy their physical needs they often set up artificial goals for themselves. In many cases they then pursue these goals with the same energy and emotional involvement that they otherwise would have put into the search for physical necessities. Thus the aristocrats of the Roman Empire had their literary pretensions; many European aristocrats a few centuries ago invested tremendous time and energy in hunting, though they certainly didn’t need the meat; other aristocracies have competed for status through elaborate displays of wealth; and a few aristocrats, like Hirohito, have turned to science.
he was weaving before Donald even knew about “the weave” 😂
- The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in “advanced” countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in “advanced” countries.
- The industrial-technological system may survive or it may break down. If it survives, it MAY eventually achieve a low level of physical and psychological suffering, but only after passing through a long and very painful period of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will be inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of dignity and autonomy.
- If the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later.
- We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system.
https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/national/unabom-manifesto-1.html
what difference will it make?
what will you do if it’s real? what if it’s not?
i wrote the question with one of these TrevorNoah accents ☞ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6JzBLpMPwk
mirror mirror on the wall,
who will have the last word on this stupid brawl?