🤷

      • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s probably what the urban planner who didn’t put a pavement where people are clearly walking would say ;)

        • Not a newt@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Speed bumps are disproportionally less effective on vehicles with larger wheels, which is the trend for SUVs and trucks these days. So while a compact or sedan may slow down for the bump, your average pavement princess will respect the bumps as much as they’ll respect speed limits around schools. Which is to say, not at all.

        • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Speed bumps slow me down far less than curves.

          My car (small truck) is most comfortable going over bumps at 30mph… Not the 10 they expect you to slow to. At 10 you get bounced around, at 30 you get 2 separate bumps that are far less uncomfortable.

          I call that really crappy design.

        • Saapas@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Speed bumps are to solve issues with existing design. Curved roads are good design to begin with and you won’t need speed bumps.

          • petrescatraian@libranet.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            @MBech @Nanook Not only that they’re more expensive, but they can be done wrong and are often done wrong, to the point that regular use wears them down or simply moves them away (if it’s not the people who move them away).

              • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 days ago

                Anecdote: a street near my house in high school had speed bumps next to the park. Occasionally people would be woken up at 3am to a dunk Douchebag shredding down the road at 50 and launching himself off the speed bumps and smashing into stretside cars.

                Eventually they had the bright idea (after a few years in a row of snowplows damaging their blades and the road needing repairs) to make a gentle S-curve instead. Now you don’t feel like you can go 10mph over the limit, the road only needs minor repairs every 5 yearsnor so, and to my knowledge nobody has launched themselves into stationary vehicles in many years.

                • vas@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  While I appreciate the well thought out comment, I can’t help but note that they should’ve used the Transporter Room since you were around!

    • rnercle@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      it’s a very calm dead-end street with maybe 8 houses and iirc speed is limited to 30km. You can walk in the middle of the street and you would still be safe.

      There was even a hoop left in the street. If kids can play basketball there, i think you can walk safely.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Lmao the mouth-breathing rabid idiots from fuckcars are literally incapable of thinking. They just see asphalt and immediately start attacking anything in sight that moves.

      • vas@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        You should go to that street, stop people who walk and explain them.

        Or, embrace this community of “Desire Paths” and think about “why?”. Accept that they have reasons to do what they are doing, and don’t try to teach them life as you know it ;-)

          • vas@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            I mean my message as a joke. The idea of “Desire Paths” is that you note how people work, frequently against “rules”, when they simply walk around on grass. Above I disagree with @merde@sh.itjust.works’s point about the safety of this street, because in my mind, if the desire path is as on the picture, then there are good reasons for it to be this case. I then go on and suggest to embrace it and not consider the street so safe maybe.

            Actually re-reading my message, I think I’m wa-a-ay too aggressive and pushy. The OP just notes his opinion, and their message wasn’t mandating that it’s the truth and the final truth. I guess I should be more chill

            • rnercle@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              there’s an “official” mapped bike/walk path that joins the street 200m away. It passes through a park and a creek. From the traces what i assume is that after riding between trees and on a path, people don’t want to get down to the street but just continue riding/walking on the grass (which no longer is grass).

              I love desire paths but i really couldn’t understand this one. I’ve seen more interesting ones in that area, i just need a break from the rain to have the courage to stop and take photos.

              i thought i’ve found a shortcut but the street curves away from my commute. I may go back on a sunny Sunday.

              Looks like a rich suburb that can influence decision makers to privatise the circulation by having multiple dead-ends. If a car is there, they’re either lost or they live there.