The court ruled that the lower court made a mistake in ruling that the woman, Kate Cox, who is more than 20 weeks pregnant, was entitled to a medical exception.

Ms. Cox asked the lower court for approval after she learned that her fetus had a fatal condition, and after several trips to the emergency room.

In short, the life or health exemptions to abortion bans in Republican-controlled states are meaningless.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 months ago

    The idea that a woman has to prove to legal satisfaction that she was raped in order to get an abortion is so fucking sickening. There shouldn’t be the same standard for a raped woman to get an abortion than there is to convict her rapist.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      While I think its sickening, they need some way to at least prove it happened to legal satisfaction. Not the same standard I agree.

      If all you had to do was claim rape and invent an imaginary situation the police would never figure out (e.g masked rapist in a no camera area of town when no one was around) then every woman could just claim rape to get an abortion.

      Filing a false police report probably has consequences but worse than having an unwanted child?

      Although I’m not saying a conviction is needed here, but some sort of medical agreement that rape was likely, however they determine that now with rape kits.

      This whole thing is maddening though. They should be able to get an abortion if they want one end of story.

      Edit: for anyone who wants to or has downvoted me here, please do tell me how we can ban abortions and have an exception for rape, but not have a way of verifying a rape without allowing 100% of woman to claim rape for 100% of abortions. This shitty situation is reality, and you can’t just disagree and say they should be allowed an abortion because they want one. That’s not a valid answer to our current situation as shitty as it is.

      • zarp86@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Edit: for anyone who wants to or has downvoted me here, please do tell me how we can ban abortions and have an exception for rape

        The answer here is simple: I reject the premise of the question. Banning abortion but having an exception for rape is morally disingenuous. You can’t say “abortion is murder some of the time.”

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          If that’s your stance that’s fair, I made an assumption that the downvotes were from people upset that I was explaining why they can’t just allow a rape claim without some confirmation a rape actually happened.

          Edit: I was just explaining the situation, though.

          Edit: also thanks, I appreciate the answer.