• Kcap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This feels like something they’ll teach about at the Gavin Nelson Institute of Tethics.

  • massive_bereavement@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    2 days ago

    We… we are clearly in the stupidest universe, right? I don’t believe it can get stupider. (Though I said this before in 2016)

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        Except the problems are worse and more numerous, and the President isn’t looking for an expert, plus he’s one of the bigger problems.

        • Zorque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, the problem in Idiocracy is that there was no one intelligent enough to listen to. In reality, there’s plenty of intelligence, but few in power listen to the ones trying to better the planet. Theyre all more concerned about accumulating power and the next election cycle. If it doesnt look good, no matter how many it might help, its not worth doing to them.

        • Leigh Weigh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I almost put that and I should’ve. But I didn’t know how many people would get it.

          We don’t have time for a hand job Joe!

    • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, it is, in fact, stupider: Trump replaced a picture of a President Joe Biden in the White House with a picture of an autopen, then showed President Xi with pride, further evidence–if it were needed–that Trump is dishonorable.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      There is one level of Backrooms where there’s a long rollercoaster that never seems to end and get more bizarre as you go. That’s what we’re on.

    • BenVimes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      As the Epstein emails proved, being rich and affluent doesn’t preclude someone from also being illiterate. We like to think these real-life supervillains are smart and sophisticated, like in fiction, because at least then the world makes some amount of sense - it’s plausible that a very intelligent person could amass that level of wealth. But the reality is that many of them have the written communication skills of a teenager using MSN Messenger circa 2004.

  • Pratai@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    The bar is so fucking low with this imbecile, I’m surprised there aren’t backwards letters to be honest.

  • Čauky Mňauky@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is this real? Like, actually real?
    If yes, did they let an AI write the document?
    If yes to both… sorry, Americans, but…

    🤣🤣🤣

          • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yes. But it was a massive source of humor for me some months ago when I asked AI chatbots to generate metro map diagrams of my city.

            Sometimes the station names they wrote on them somewhat resembled real ones, but were humorously misspelled and in completely incorrect positions and orders. Other times, the overall shape of the network was roughly ok, but the station names were completely nonsensical.

            • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              True, but we figured out how to deal with the epistemiology in a world with Photoshop; I think we can probably figure it out with generative AI, too.

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m pretty sure Elon misspelled his own name in his signature, too. It’s obvious that he forgot how to write in cursive and was remembering mid-way through, but he very clearly wrote his name as “Elon Muk”. Like… the last squiggle is just barely a K, but there is a distinct lack of an S, or even a space for an S.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t know that we can necessarily critique the spelling of an abstract signature. I mean, mine is pretty unrecognizable as my name; if my initials were XYZ, my signature would kind of look like “xY–”, with a little bump at the end that you could kind of interpret as a z.

      And famously, the Disney logo looks distinctly like the signature of “Waly Gisnep.” Elvis Presley’s autograph looks like “Elim rules.” John Lennon’s looks like the autograph of someone named “Sarah Clancy.” Very fittingly, Henry Ford’s signature is “Hemmy Turd.”

      Actually, on that note and in your defense, unreadable signatures kind of seems like a requirement for terrible people. Donald Trump’s signature (“Snnnn Suuuuuuugh”) is up there looking uncomfortably like Benito Mussolini’s “VnnnnnnnWi!,” Zuck’s “Mr Zz” kind of reminds me of Adolf Hitler’s “by Him” signature, and while I can’t read Devanagari or Cyrillic, Sundar Pichai’s signature sure does call to mind Josef Stalin’s.

      But it’s a thing for not-fascists, too. Kurt Vonnegut’s signature is just a line drawing of his head with the letter “t” somewhere in his hair, Emily Dickinson’s is literally just her first name, Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s looks like “Puth Badu Jinobung,” and Charles Dickens’ signature looks like it says “Snarls Wickens” (which in hindsight would be a great band name)–and they were some of the most literate people of all time.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s one thing, but like… Can we take a moment to appreciate how shit his signature looks? It’s not just unreadable, it has zero style. Isn’t he supposed to be a CEO or something?

      • kinkles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Of all the things we can criticize him for, we’re nitpicking a signature? Mine looks like absolute dogshit.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          It would basically take an afternoon for you to come up with one and practice it enough to use it. That’s how I got mine as a child. It doesn’t have to be cursive, it doesn’t even have to be your name, and it’s not hard at all to do

          I don’t care what most people’s looks like, but if you’re going to have it appear on people’s paychecks or official documents seen by the public?

          I think in that case, it does reflect on you as a person. It’s like showing up to the store in boxers and a stained wife beater… It’s legal, and I don’t care if you dress strangely or even go naked in your own home, but people should have enough respect for themselves to at least wear athletic shorts in public. Or throw on a bathrobe or something

          It’s a very very low bar, but if you can’t meet even that it’s a cause for genuine concern about your well being. Everyone should have some level of dignity as a person

        • Concetta@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I dunno, if I was the richest man in the world and also was signing documents potentially billions of people could see, I might take 2 minutes to practice first.

      • Carmakazi@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I can’t think of a single person in my life under the age of 40 that has a “nice” signature. I’m not even sure they teach cursive in school anymore. We’re basically forced into it because it has legal importance. Mine is trash and varies from one to the next.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Mine has style. It’s not fancy or intricate, but it’s a nice mix of sharp and curving lines for the prominent characters that can be read if you already know what it says, and I can fire it off in about two seconds with a nice rasping sound

          I learned cursive very briefly when I learned handwriting, but I’ve never really used it. I still can barely read it. I spent a little time in grade school coming up with it with some good suggestions from my older sister (since it didn’t have much style in real cursive), but it’s not like I put very much effort into it. I just decided one day if people were going to make me sign my name on things, I didn’t want it to look terrible. And for reference, my handwriting is shit, barely readable to the average person

          Literally anyone can do it. It doesn’t have to be cursive, it doesn’t have to be readable, I once knew someone illiterate who just neatly printed out their name all caps. There’s no rules to it, it doesn’t even have to be cursive, it doesn’t even have to spell your name, it’s entirely a matter of style

          All of these examples, including my first attempts at my own as an actual child, were better than Elon’s.

          You could do it right now. Take half a day picking out a style, you could look at fonts for reference, fill just a couple pages to practice, and you’re done. Hell, you could hire someone on fiver to design it for you if you wanted. Either way, it’ll naturally become easy and faster as you use it

          For most people, it really doesn’t matter that much, I wouldn’t comment if the average person didn’t have a good one. But if I were going to be a CEO or politician, where other people might actually see it? Where it’s going to end up on people’s paychecks? I’d go back to the drawing board and put a little more than an afternoon into it. It’s just a matter of dignity

  • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    This explains everything! No wonder they decided not to regulate it. The “Pledge” was written by AI.