I was thinking swapping chaotic good and chaotic evil. Sitting on the armrest is horrible for the chair and liable to injure you when the chair falls over.
Maybe also swap chaotic neutral and neutral evil. Also true neutral and neutral good. I must be getting old, my whole definition of evil is based on the risk of damaging furniture.
I’m sorry, I don’t understand anything in the image apart from attempting to do one of those matrices like with hotdogs are sandwiches or whatever. What makes a seating position chaotic versus lawful?
The impossibility of a sensible, coherent answer is part of why I find this stuff fun. Like, one of my friends enjoys arguing “every good is either a salad or a sandwich” and it’s a fun false binary to play with (cereal is definitely more of a salad than a sandwich, for example )
I have to swap lawful evil and chaotic evil I’m sorry
I was thinking swapping chaotic good and chaotic evil. Sitting on the armrest is horrible for the chair and liable to injure you when the chair falls over.
Maybe also swap chaotic neutral and neutral evil. Also true neutral and neutral good. I must be getting old, my whole definition of evil is based on the risk of damaging furniture.
I feel like chaotic neutral relies on the sharing of the seat.
I’m sorry, I don’t understand anything in the image apart from attempting to do one of those matrices like with hotdogs are sandwiches or whatever. What makes a seating position chaotic versus lawful?
Armchair legislation
The impossibility of a sensible, coherent answer is part of why I find this stuff fun. Like, one of my friends enjoys arguing “every good is either a salad or a sandwich” and it’s a fun false binary to play with (cereal is definitely more of a salad than a sandwich, for example )
Well pizza is obviously a sandwich
It’s a joke.