As a consequence, have a person’s kids taken away? Or should there be any consequences?

****PLEASE READ

I’m straightforward and don’t want to give any ‘fluff’ So I don’t know how else to ask this question without it sounding rage baity.

This isn’t a gotcha or trap to argue with anyone I feel and believe I can learn something of value from people I disagree with. It is interesting to know why you disagree and what reasons make you feel x y and z about things.

I’m here to listen, not judge or throw around name calling or fight with you. You feel the way you do for whatever reason, and I want to know a little more about why you do and that is it.

I would like for everyone to feel confident voicing how they feel about this question. I don’t care if I disagree with you. Fighting with you is not how I’d like to spend my evening. I’m sure you don’t either.

I might ask follow ups like, “Why is it that you feel that way?” Or “can you tell me a little bit more” so I can understand your point of view better. And that’s it.

If that feels too much or you don’t want to. Totally fine. Just ignore my comment to you.

Thanks for your time.

  • DelilahBlack@lemm.eeOP
    22·
    10 months ago

    They should be able to take blockers until they decide but they must also as a condition be testdriving what its like to do other gender stuff (dress, name, vocal, etc).

    Thank you for answering my question, appreciate your response. So for this part, would you consider any age appropriate for a child to get on blockers? Or do you feel more like there should be an age limitation? I know that’s a hot issue, so I’m just curious what your thoughts on that are.

    For the rest of your comment. If I think you’re talking about what I think you are, then I do agree with that.

    Are you at all thinking of Jazz and her mother? If so, do you have any thoughts on that specific case at all?

    Thanks again

    • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
      41·
      10 months ago

      At the end of the day, any bill that tries to codify or restrict any of this needs to be converted into a funding bill so it can be studied more and the political bullshit limited.

      It is clearly living rent-free in many psychos minds so it needs to pay rent by converting all their restrictions that promise nothing and demand everything that conveniently also drive up the cost and legal ramifications of the whole thing or make it downright impossible and punish those who seek to pursue it into funding that eases the psychos minds by promising funding and research to further investigate what it is, who needs it, and how to optimize the process so it is done properly, given to those who need it and not just want to try on different costumes or are facing coercion, and that no politicians need to be involved or say anythjng about it at all like cancer or adhd or anything else more established

      The medical field needs to be responsible for applying evidence-based medicine on the entire discourse. Any politician who tries to divide or dictate this policy needs to be

      1. sued to oblivion and be personally liable
      2. courts need to strike it down every time as whatever they need to designate is as to illustrate the intrusion of the political into the personal and physical body rights likely enshrined or should be enshrined already
      3. Trans stuff is not a social issue that should be up for debate. It is a rare medical thing and everybody should get their damn paws off it and let medicine dictate how we proceed.
      4. if people who went thru it regret it, they are free to express that and add to the knowledge base but this shit where right-wing eats it up and tries to destroy other people in oncoming generations who actually need it and likely will face irreversible harm if they are forced to undergo regular puberty that can be delayed with the proper meds until they make a more solid determination—that is beyond fucking evil and that+person should be struck the fuck down