Which is it? A post about the moral value of political spending—whether it was negative towards military spending like this one, or if it were a hypothetical one in favour of spending more on the military—is inherently making a political statement, regardless of which way it was meant. You can hardly say there’s no room for political discussion in a post about one of the biggest things politics spends money on.
Which is it? A post about the moral value of political spending—whether it was negative towards military spending like this one, or if it were a hypothetical one in favour of spending more on the military—is inherently making a political statement, regardless of which way it was meant. You can hardly say there’s no room for political discussion in a post about one of the biggest things politics spends money on.
No more debate. You’ve sidetracked this thread enough as it is
Read the comments at this link. This is how you post here. Anything else and it’s honestly easier for me to just ban you rather than debating lol
https://libreddit.northboot.xyz/r/NonCredibleDefense/comments/1c0caw5/best_friends_spend_more_than_1_on_defense/