The boy attack stabbed another man in an incident police said had the “hallmarks” of terrorism but was yet to be declared a terrorist act.

Western Australia police shot dead a “radicalized” 16-year-old boy on Saturday night after he stabbed a man in Perth.

State Premier Roger Cook said the teenager attacked a man and then “rushed” at police officers, armed with a kitchen knife.

The police responded by shooting him twice with Tasers before firing a single fatal shot.

  • Carrolade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Why are “hallmarks”, “radicalized” and “rushed” all in quotes? I could see an argument for radicalized, but hallmarks of terrorism is pretty standard stuff, and rushing is just a basic English language verb, synonymous with running. Odd to emphasize them as quotes.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      They are quotes surrounded by quotation marks.

      The newspaper isn’t an authority on radicalization, they are quoting a source.

      • Carrolade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        Then a lot more should be within quotes. How do they know he was armed with a knife, were they there watching?

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Go learn about journalistic practices in headlines and titles.

          • Carrolade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            7 months ago

            A claim is a claim. The attacker “rushing” is no different from the attacker being armed with a “knife”. Both are quotes from the police.

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              Again, just go look up the standards.

              Not sure why you’re trying to convince me it should be different, I’m not gonna change it even if I agreed.

              • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                7 months ago

                You responded to me, I am defending my statement.

                The article is inconsistent with standard practices, by only selectively putting quote marks around certain parts of officers claims. Apparently pointing this out bothers you.

                • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  No, you haven’t grasped the concept and I implored you to seek and authoritative source.

  • cybersin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    7 months ago

    an incident police said had the “hallmarks” of terrorism

    Because the cops got a tip from a Muslim about a teen who at one point used the internet?

    Uhh…?