From the Atlanta Daily World:

Kamala Harris set out on a mission to define herself on the final night of the 2024 Democratic National Convention. The world  watching, she stated her case on why she should serve as the next President of the United States of America.  “With this election, our nation has a precious, fleeting opportunity to move past … Continued

The post Kamala Harris Makes History As 1st Black Woman Nominated To Be President, Now America Must Do The Right Thing appeared first on Atlanta Daily World.

  • Cam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    20 days ago

    The right being not to vote at all. Voting in this election is a vote for the system. Not voting is a vote stating you do not buy the theatre and BS.

    • finestnothing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      In the last 20 years, the average voter turnout has been around 40%, trending upwards steadily. It got a big help by trump which made the 2020 election have a 66% voter turnout to vote him out (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout_in_United_States_presidential_elections).

      Politicians in pre-2000 sure must’ve felt the pressure of the non-voter stance constantly right? Influenced policy even? It’s crazy… But it almost seems like… The government only cares about votes that are submitted? That can’t be right though, you said by not voting I would be sticking it to them!

    • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      20 days ago

      Not voting means the old fucks who will vote no matter what get to elect Trump.

      But keep up with the doomer shit, it’s really helping!

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Non participation does not mean unaffected. Especially when a trump presidency puts new and increasing risks/pressure on already at risk groups

      Where we are isnt good, and deserves condemnation and action to evoke positive change.

      Where we could go (1 of 2 possible outcomes) is a whole lot worse.

      Some people want to take the best realistic option to try to improve things. Some people just want to hold their chin up high and proud and watch shit burn