• egeres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Isn’t the fediverse fragile long-term wise from a structural point of view? I have this feeling that a ton of small lemmy instances will die over the years taking content away (I don’t expect this will happen with lemmy.world). Is this something that could happen? Will it be a problem?

    • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      One way to deal with it is to add an easy way to transfer users and posts from one instance to another. I’m pretty sure there are tickets about it, but I don’t know what’s the status of it.

    • janonymous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I thought the content will still be available on the other instances that were federated before the instance went down.

      • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is stored on the instance. If the instance goes, the content is gone too.
        I don’t know exactly will something be cached, but even if it is, eventually it will be invalidated too.

      • Franklin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Could we do something like a central ledger for users that an instance could opt in to hosting but still isn’t controlled centrally?

        • rmuk@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Representing the quorum in some kind of logical chain of consensus-derived blocks, you say?