• Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    Just imagine this with the books I had to read in school. Yes, I would have read it, I’m a fast reader, so a bad book does not waste too much time. On the other hand, I would have no problems with grilling the author over the shit he or she wrote. Because basically every book we had to read for school was crap. There are so many good books, books that would spark interest and passion for reading more, but somehow they had selected the worst of the worst back then, aimed at making children reel in horror when they see books and vow never to touch a book again after school.

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      29 days ago

      Part of it is also what they make you do to the book. I remember one exercise involving a book of our choice and of course I selected one I already liked at the time. The analysis itself tends to make a book a lot less fun.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      29 days ago

      Huh. I guess my experience was better I remember reading My Side of the Mountain and The Giver, among other things. Usually pretty decent reads though.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        28 days ago

        I read The Giver as an adult, and I can absolutely confirm it was good. I also recall the books I was required to read were pretty good, but I didn’t like them at the time because they were required.

        • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          27 days ago

          I always assumed that the kid and the baby die at the end, but then I guess the author wrote a second book just to make everyone feel better.