• Radioactive Butthole@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Meh. I just wish XML was easier to parse. I have to shuttle a lot of XML data back and forth. As far as I can tell, the only way to query the data is to download a whole engine to run a special query language, and that doesn’t really integrate into any of my workflows. JSON retains the hierarchy and is trivially parsed in almost any programming language. I bet a JSON file containing the exact same data would be much smaller also, since you don’t list each tag twice.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      XML is also tricky to parse because people forget it is for documents too. It’s basically like HTML. Mixed content elements are allowed. <foo>hey <bar>there</bar> friend</foo> is valid XML. So iterating over elements is trickier than JSON (which is just key value pairs and arrays).

    • bob_lemon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I still want someone to explain to me why XML even needs namespaces (which cause about 95% of all issues regarding XML).

      There is a way to separate different XML structures, it’s called files.

      • Radioactive Butthole@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        That’s kind of my point though. For being made specifically for the purpose of being machine readable, its kind of a pain in the ass to work with.

        I want a command line utility where I can just

        xmlquery --query 'some/query' --file foo.xml --output foo-out.xml
        

        or in python

        
        import xml
        
        with open("foo.xml", "r") as file:
            data = xml.load(file.read())
        

        That’s the amount of effort I want to put into parsing a data storage format.