TehBamski@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 19 days agoWhat's the best loophole you've ever found or learned about?message-squaremessage-square228fedilinkarrow-up1148arrow-down12
arrow-up1146arrow-down1message-squareWhat's the best loophole you've ever found or learned about?TehBamski@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 19 days agomessage-square228fedilink
minus-squareFlax@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down6·19 days agoTwo people bound together for life for the purposes of creating a family
minus-squarejet@hackertalks.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·19 days agoSo divorce shouldn’t be allowed in this philosophy?
minus-squareFlax@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down6·19 days agoOnly as a last resort. You shouldn’t get married without intending to stay together for life.
minus-squareCileTheSane@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2·19 days ago“You shouldn’t use marriage to stop yourself being legally chained to your parents. The purpose of marriage is to legally chain you to your spouse.” If people could “divorce” their parents you wouldn’t have to worry about this.
minus-squareDragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·19 days agoOnly two? That seems needlessly restrictive. Is it for religious reasons? Church and state should be separated.
minus-squareFlax@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down4·edit-219 days agoIf it was for religious reasons, I would have specified it as a “man and a woman” Also, if it’s more than two, that’s not a marriage; that’s a group chat.
minus-squareDragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·19 days agoYou still didn’t explain why.
Two people bound together for life for the purposes of creating a family
So divorce shouldn’t be allowed in this philosophy?
Only as a last resort. You shouldn’t get married without intending to stay together for life.
“You shouldn’t use marriage to stop yourself being legally chained to your parents. The purpose of marriage is to legally chain you to your spouse.”
If people could “divorce” their parents you wouldn’t have to worry about this.
Only two? That seems needlessly restrictive. Is it for religious reasons? Church and state should be separated.
If it was for religious reasons, I would have specified it as a “man and a woman”
Also, if it’s more than two, that’s not a marriage; that’s a group chat.
You still didn’t explain why.