I don’t necessarily agree that rules need to be rechecked to see if they are still valid, but I wish they’d at least provide some examples. As-is, kinda sounds a threat. If you don’t cancel 10% of the rules/laws, then we’ll force you to do an economic impact on all of them. Which, maybe I missed something, but after doing the economic impact, then what? I don’t recall reading that they’d have to do anything based on the results.