Summary

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has begun administering polygraph tests to employees in an effort to identify individuals leaking information about immigration operations.

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem and border czar Tom Homan have blamed recent leaks for lower-than-expected ICE arrest numbers.

Noem stated that two leakers had been identified and would be prosecuted, though it’s unclear if polygraphs were used.

While DHS has used polygraphs before for hiring screenings, they are now being used to question employees about leaks of classified or sensitive law enforcement information.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Your regular reminder that polygraphs are junk science that arent admissible in court.

    You’d be just as successful finding the truth by hiring a phrenologist to study the bumps of peoples heads.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I had a co-worker that managed to score himself a pretty decent aerospace job. He was a damn good coder, college graduate, No debt no drug use whatsoever, nicest guy in the world. This one time a baby mouse got stuck in a recycling can by his desk. He gave it water put a little piece of Rice krispie treat and with it so it had something to eat. The mouse took a bite of the rice krispie treat and kealed over dead. He sobbed about that for the whole day and was mopey for the rest of the week.

      Anyway he passed all the practical exams with flying colors. They’ve gone through months of investigation and he was fine. Finally came time for the polygraph. He went for the poly, found some time later that it was not good. Listen I’m back for another poly. Some number of days or weeks later it came back is not good.

      I’m like dude, what’s happening when you’re going in there are they asking you complicated morality questions or something? Basically it came down to about halfway through the test he would just start freaking out that he wasn’t going to pass it get nervous, upset, The second time he actually cried a little bit.

      He never did get that job. But I can assure you that if he had he would have gone to his grave with any secrets that ever would have come out of there.

  • Tailzse836@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 hours ago

    “To find leakers” lol nope. This is being done to fire non loyalists to Trump.

  • civil_drive@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Have they stopped to consider that they maybe are just super incompetent idiots? Who am I kidding, they lack the intelligence for introspection and are incapable of coming to rational conclusions.

  • Doctor_Satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    If you’re going to rely on pseudo-scoentific bullshit, you might as well bring in some palm readers and voodoo priests instead. At least that’ll be entertaining.

    EDIT - Just want to add this - Never, under any circumstances, should you take a polygraph test. If you are a suspect (legally or otherwise), they will not use the results to exonerate you. If they suspect you did it, but the polygraph doesn’t detect any deception, they will throw out the results as “unreadable” and pursue other means of investigating you. But if the results detect deception, they will treat it like the fucking Oracle at Delphi.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Seriously american obsession with this snake oil bullshit is staggering. It never worked in any reasonable extent and how could it?

      The idea of detecting lying by measuring “heart rate and co” is plainly idiotic and anyone who’s part of this should be shamed into obscurity.

  • wwb4itcgas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    18 hours ago

    That might have made more sense if polygraph testing actually performed better than a dice roll. The US Congress Office of Technology Assessment and the National Academy of Sciences could’ve told DHS that, but I guess they didn’t think to ask.

    Or think in general.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    1 day ago

    Polygraph tests are so unreliable, they’re not even admissible in court.

    Not exactly a rock solid case if someone who’s fired decides to sue - which I hope happens frequently.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 day ago

      they’re “reliable enough” for their intended purpose here: fire people who aren’t “in line”.

    • vortic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      22 hours ago

      It’s in their contract that the results of a polygraph are grounds for dismissal alone. They have no grounds to sue.

  • Glytch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 day ago

    Glad they’re using polygraphs, they’re unreliable enough that the leakers won’t be caught.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      18 hours ago

      No, they’re unreliable enough that whoever they want to be caught, will be caught.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Hit the nail on the head here.

        5 bucks says the “suspects” all end up being gay, women, or non-white. You know. the same groups of people they blame everything on.

    • evilcultist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      They’re just trying to scare people enough into having a reaction or admitting fault. Someone could also fail because they are afraid they will fail or they’re afraid they’re a suspect. If the actual leaker thinks they’re doing the right thing andthat the poly can’t catch them, they probably won’t even have a reaction.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yeah but they’re unreliable enough that someone will get caught regardless of whether they leaked anything.

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      As someone who has taken a polygraph, there’s nuance.

      First, they’re unreliable because they can be beat- but neither you or I are beating them, you have to be trained to beat it.

      Second, the reason they don’t work is because you can just not talk. But if you’re forced to talk to keep your job, you’re gonna show lots of lying indicators.

      Third, it’s not a binary “did you lie”. They’re watching your blood pressure, heart rate, detecting any fidgets; things you subconsciously do when you lie. The person administrating the polygraph will then press you into a confession.

      Polygraph is the biggest snake oil in contemporary crime “science” and frankly its infuriating that it still exists and everyone who defends it should be bullied into returning back to sanity.

      Edit: Not going to bother responding to the silly replies from armchair psychologists who feel smart “knowing” polygraphs are unreliable. For the vast majority of the population, when answering binary questions, you will answer them differently depending on whether or not you lie. Regardless of whether or not “this is admissible in court”, it’s more than enough to deny someone a clearance renewal. Rub your brain cells together and extrapolate.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Thats just plainly false.

        There’s no reliable correlation between lying and heart rate or any other bodily functions. It’s an intellectual act after all not a physical one. It simply doesn’t compute.

        The physiological response could be driven by literally anything and there’s no way to isolated it to “lying” - what if I’m nervous just because I’m being interrogated by people who are known to be dirty and untrustworthy?

        Polygraph is the biggest snake oil in contemporary crime “science” and frankly its infuriating that it still exists and everyone who defends it should be bullied into returning back to sanity.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The physiological response could be driven by literally anything and there’s no way to isolated it to “lying” - what if I’m nervous just because I’m being interrogated by people who are known to be dirty and untrustworthy?

          This is why they’re unreliable. Too many false positives. But the stress of lying can produce a physiological response, which is the basis for the polygraph in the first place.

          But people can also control their responses, so there’s also a high possibly of false negatives.

          The true positive and true negative rate is too low to be considered reliable, but it’s not like there’s zero basis in fact, like those bomb scanners that were literally empty shells.

      • Doctor_Satan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        17 hours ago

        There is no machine or drug or anything else that can “detect” a lie or signs of deception. Polygraph results are purely interpretive, and anything that’s given to interpretation is given to the bias of the interpreter. Polygraph results are also wildly inconsistent. That’s why they are generally not admissible in court.

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 day ago

      bruh. us prisons employ multiple “pacification” techniques that draw from torture tricks. the intelligence community that’s willing to work with musk is absolutely a modern gestapo or okrana

    • doctortofu@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      Probably because it’s kinda hard to check if a ghost had the “correct” skin color and/or genitals…

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        You could honestly just ask the ghost via the oiuja board and it would be roughly as meaningful as a polygraph

    • jumperalex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Doesn’t matter. They are good enough to justify denial of clearance which means loss of job.

      I have no faith that lawsuits will prevail here based on precedence supporting polygraphs as a credibility and suitability discriminator.

  • greenfire@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is the current US regime actually fascist, or is it just some kind of nausea-inducing Keystone Kops reality TV farce doomed to total failure & obscurity?