• softcat@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Because it’s a literal quotation from the victim, read the article.

        • softcat@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          If I’m right about your intentions, you’re attempting to portray the author and paper as minimizing what happened to the kid. That doesn’t seem valid at all, given that a) the entire article is about what happened to the victim and outlining the case, and not disputing her claims b) it’s literally in the article as a quote, just read the thing already.

          • workerONE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Why can’t the author say she was raped? Adding quotes means it is no longer a statement of fact, it becomes a report about someone’s account of what happened.

            • softcat@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Because in the unlikely event that this isn’t what happened and the court finds them not guilty, the paper would be liable for damages that came from making that statement. Libel law exists, so they can’t just state it.

              Hence running a quote, plus using the industry standard in the article, “alleged”. After the conviction it’s a matter of legal fact.

        • ijedi1234@sh.itjust.worksBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          It “might” be “something” that “requires” further “investigation”.

    • jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Plausible deniability to not get sued by not themselves making the claim but instead quoting the victim. A lack of integrity from the editors.

  • Lexam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Could somebody familiar with Indian currency do an exchange rate? The converter I found said 5lak is only $.06 USD.

    • Syl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      A lakh is 100,000.

      500,000 INR is $5900 USD or 5200 euros.

      I tried a purchasing power comparing website since goods and services are cheaper in India and salaries are lower. It says the purchasing power of 500,000 INR in India is equivalent to the purchasing power of $24,700 USD in the US.

  • softcat@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m a bit disappointed to see the tendency observed on Reddit to be replicated here.

    Does this article deserve more upvotes and attention than it has currently? Yes. There should be more attention paid to the case and issue broadly, and more pressure to prevent these things from ever happening. So you can stop typing that reply now. I have no problem highlighting gender inequality and crime in India, as it’s the only way to improve from what’s currently in place.

    Did 26 people getting shot to death in a terrorist attack in India last week garner this much attention, or upvotes? No, not even half as much. To me that smacks of implicit biases that deserve mention and questioning.