• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Transportation officials also said the total cost of Buttigieg’s flights on FAA planes up to that time was about $42,000. Chao took 15 FAA flights early in the Trump administration, and the cost of just one of them, which was international, was nearly $69,000, the Post reports.

    It’s good both are being investigated, but definitely seems like Pete’s isn’t that big of a deal compared to what Republicans do

    • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      88
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not convinced it is a good thing that both are being investigated if the investigation into Buttigieg is just political smearing. HRC’s emails show the cost of abusive investigations. Investigations aren’t cost free, either monetarily or in terms of public trust in institutions. It implies he did something worth investigating, and devalues the seriousness of real investigations, like those against Trump.

      When the review was announced, Buttigieg had flown on FAA planes 18 times out of 138 flights for official trips since becoming secretary early in 2021, according to The Washington Post. He takes commercial flights most of the time, and when he uses FAA aircraft, it’s usually because it’s cheaper than commercial flights, a Department of Transportation spokeswoman said.

      This does not seem to be something worth investigating.

      • squiblet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 year ago

        devalues the seriousness of real investigations

        The only thing people like Green or Jordan doing Congress is distract, distract, distract.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        Huh?

        If they investigate him, and everything is cool, then it’s cool… Which is what the article sounds like.

        If he’s abusing it, just to a much smaller degree, then that’s still an issue.

        Like, that’s the whole point of not just holding people from your “own team” accountable. If someone might be doing something wrong, you investigate them no matter who they are.

        Do you think an investigation means a huge thing where he testifies in front of Congress? That’s not an investigation.

        • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am not against holding “my own team” accountable if there is some valid reason to think there is something worth investigating. If there isn’t, it is a witch hunt, and witch hunts are harmful. They can be used to harass, waste time, and slander by vague insinuation. More to the point, the public has finite attention. News of pointless investigations can be used strategically to drown out real ones, which is a threat to democracy. That is, I believe, what Republicans are presently doing.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah, but when you have obvious and public cases of MASSIVE corruption in “your own team” and you fail to adress that… instead gojng after any “petty” corruption in the other team…

          Yeah. That’s a problem.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            If someone steals 100 million from a charity, it doesn’t mean we dont care if someone else stole 10k…

            And it certainly doesn’t mean we don’t even look if someone stole 10k

            • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You missed the point.

              Or your ignoring it because you know that your team doesn’t care aboutnl corruption, just scoring political points.

              Either way you slice it, republicans are patently and blatantly corrupt and only going after democrats because they’re democrats.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Either way you slice it, republicans are patently and blatantly corrupt and only going after democrats because they’re democrats.

                So?

                Literally who cares what they’re doing. Dems should be investigating everyone regardless of party.

                Otherwise no Dem will ever be held accountable, because Republicans are completely incompetent. It won’t take long of that for grifters to take over both parties.

                Holding everyone accountable shouldn’t be a controversy statement.

                • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Otherwise no Dem will ever be held accountable

                  held accountable for…what, exactly? having a big cock? or having a job? or, Biden doing business after leaving the whitehouse? Or Pete Travelling? Literally none of these house investigations- which are being done by REPUBLICANS- are being conducted in good faith. it’s partisan politics, and it’s a massive waste of time. Because Democrats do hold their own accountable where republicans absolutely do not.

                  There is zero evidence of corruption here- or else it would be moved to criminal courts- See, for example, Senator Menendez.

                  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Or Pete Travelling?

                    I’m trying to stay on topic here…

                    But yes, if he used government private flights when he should have paid for his own travel.

                    It doesn’t matter if Republicans abuse it more. Democrats are supposed to be the adults in the room. And adults don’t get to get away with stuff just because the toddler threw shit on the walls.

                    If he didn’t do anything wrong, then it’s very easy to prove. There’s all types of records for this stuff and a GS6 could put a report together in an afternoon.

                    There’s zero reason not to do that

        • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The problem is, Republicans don’t tell the truth. When you actually press the investigative committee into Hunter Biden about the evidence they have, they’ll quietly murmur there isn’t any. But otherwise, they’ll very loudly suggest they have evidence and outright lie.

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      As usual, republicans try to make democrats doing something normal seem like a huge scandalous deal while they and their sleazy-ass media hyenas entirely ignore what “their side” did or does.