• alg602@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know what will happen with City. My guess is very little.

    Chelsea are self reporting financial irregularities and violations identified through the due diligence process and subsequent takeover process. Hitting current ownership with a massive points deduction seems counter intuitive and unlikely. I would expect a massive fine, instead, and possible transfer window bans.

    • WestwardCycles10456@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      financial irregularities and violations

      So they’re just allowed to get away with it because it happened under a previous ownership? If I went to the police and admitted to committing a murder would I get away with it just because I said that it happened 2 years ago and I had a different girlfriend at the time?

        • SanchoRivera@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          How about this analogy: if the previous owners of a block of land buried toxic waste there, and after purchasing the land I discovered it and reported it, would I be let off the hook? Nope, I would be legally responsible for the clean up and the ongoing impacts. I could sue the previous owners but if they’ve hightailed it to a favourable jurisdiction then I’m left with the mess.

          • alg602@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Actually yes. It depends how you buy the land and the legal documents. That’s what reps and warranties and indemnifications are for in the documents.

    • STILETT0_exists@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not what happened with Reading. Club is hemhorraging money right now and they’re getting monthly points deductions.

    • Aaaaand-its-gone@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I suspect city’s policy of throwing a Fuck load of very expensive lawyers and money at the case and refusing to admit any wrongdoing will work out better than them, than Chelsea being compliant

    • Common_List7560@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or that would set a precedent that all you need to do to avoid the punishments is change ownership. Both clubs need to be punished, otherwise corruption has won

    • Doc_Eckleburg@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agree, Clearlake withheld £100 million of the fee during the Chelsea purchase to cover any potential fines they might face after investigation, makes far more sense for the FA to take a chunk of that then to dock points.

    • _pjanic@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I say toss a 20 point deduction at Chelsea and a 100 point deduction at City. And if City don’t make 100 this season, they get the rest next season in the Championship.

    • FakeTriII@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah the most recent leaks are far more damning and weren’t self reported. The fact that your ownership have already admitted financial irregularities might not help your case ultimately