Roman Abramovich is accused of paying people under the table. Man City have 115 charges.

Under Abramovich Chelsea have won - 5 League titles, 2 UCLs, 2 Europa Leagues, 5 FA Cups, 3 energy drink Cups, 2 supercups,

Under Sheikh Mansour Man City have won - 7 league titles, 1 UCL, 3 FA Cups 6 energy drink cups, 1 super cup.

Lets say hypothetically the EPL manage to prove it happened. And the points deduction is something that even Man City cannot recover from Eg. 90+ points deducted.

Would you be willing to accept a relegation to the championship for the above memories?

Eg. you saw your club win those things and have the memories of watching it?

  • Cowboy_on_fire@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Firstly, Thank you for mentioning what most people don’t; the fact that there were only a handful of teams that could realistically win the league and UCL because of FFP. So the footing has never been even. People like to pretend things were perfect before Chelsea and later city came around with the money to compete, but it was not at all that way.

    To answer your question; I would absolutely take the memories and things I’ve seen over the past decade or so(93:20 top of my mind) even if that means we get relegated to the championship. I also think it’s highly unlikely we would stay there for more than a season, particularly if even just a few of our players stayed. It would honestly be kind of amusing to watch us absolutely destroy the championship, but also kind of sad for the team the actual championship teams.

    With that said, my ideal situation is that we are cleared of all charges and people just deal with the fact that someone new became dominant fairly. However even if we are cleared of all charges we all know that won’t happen. For the rest of time rival fans will claim we bought or strong armed our way out of the charges.

    • DANIEL7696@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Idk why you and op push this agenda that ffp is complete shit, it allows teams to progress(Villa,Brighton and others did) but by being financially sound, not by getting a sugar daddy. If there would be no FFP the biggest teams could pay enormous fees and the smaller ones would go bust trying to compete. If i were a midtable team fan I’d rather my club stay in it’s lane than overspend and end up in league 2

      • Cowboy_on_fire@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        There is no perfect answer for this because you are 100% right. It’s exploitative not to allow smaller teams the growth and financial power they would need to actually challenge for titles. It’s equally exploitative to allow crazy spending by only those who how the means. There needs to be a middle road and we haven’t found it yet