despite being owned by a state with which the UK has many interests economically will it be one of the cases that might go unpunished?
despite being owned by a state with which the UK has many interests economically will it be one of the cases that might go unpunished?
they just said in the Everton independent commission document that fines aren’t sufficient when the owners are wealthy - punishment will be sporting for infringements by rich clubs
Watch them revert on this when they have to do something to City
you heard that city group, up the bribes!
A transfer ban is a sporting infringement.
Money is unlimited when it comes to the saudis. They won’t give a shit about a £100m fine and they’ll continue business as usual.
How do they determine who’s rich and who’s not when every owner of a Premier League club is rich?
Yep basically everyone except Brentford and Nottingham Forest
Ah, but everton is actually a different club. They wouldn’t do anything to hurt their favorite little golden child. If that were the case they would have done it years ago
lol wat. Then why charge City at all after they were wholly exonerated by CAS? The charges have already done plenty of damage because your average know-nothing red club fan presumes guilt from the outset which the media happily tap into.
They weren’t “exonerated by CAS”. They got off on a technicality because UEFA filed the charges too late under their own rules.
Might want to do the smallest bit of research next time before confidently being completely wrong. It will help you not look like a complete tit.
That was for one £8 million sponsorship. Shocking to be this confident and wrong when the evidence is publicly available
As I replied to the other bullshitter:
https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fnnkd2u49xw0b1.jpg
In my book “no evidence” = exonerated
Not sure why downvoted, it’s literally the truth lol
They got off cos it was too long in the past. The PL don’t have such rules.
No, that’s the bullshit narrative that is pushed on here and certain sections of the media. The truth is there was no evidence:
https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fnnkd2u49xw0b1.jpg
That’s directly from the CAS judgement which I’m sure you’ve already read(lol)
It’s all about pressure from both sides. Can the public threaten the sanctity of the money-making machine enough, or is a sovereign ruler too imposing? The two sides may discuss where the threshold is… at some point, I’d guess, it’s just worth accepting a real hit.
Surely they just wouldn’t press charges in the first place then ? I don’t get this logic the FA are doing years of investigation when that have no intention of following up ?
Could you link that document? Rather interested what it said
here
Wait, it says a loss up to to 15 mil is largely forgiven but we only lost 4.5 Mill more and lose 10 points?😂
Losses up to £105m over three years are forgiven (as long as you haven’t been in the championship and there is owner funding)
The amounts you’re seeing are the amounts over that threshold - the PL says you’re roughly £20m over it, Everton says they’re just under £10m over it
But that’s £115m - £135m losses over three years
Yeah my mistake I misread it. We had losses of 124.5 mil. 20 mil extra is nothing considering how much players cost nowadays.
Everton had a loss of 300mil with 180mil or something deducted.