• someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    No it’s not a population thing because MN’s percentage is substantially lower. It’s not a population map because MN’s percentage is substantially lower. That’s what the original comment meant. You have this all twisted up somehow so I’m just gonna leave it here.

    • 13igTyme@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The original comment says “this”. The original post mentions both TX and FL immigrant population as well as MN.

      “This” could be interpreted two different ways in relation to the original comment. I took it to mean that the volume of immigrants per state in relation to total population of the original mentioned FL and TX.

      The percentage doesn’t matter. The percentage count be .001% or it could be 30% and they’d still go after someone that hurt Don’s feelings.