• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    7 days ago

    Thinking about how there’s gotta be some dogfucker out there going, “Hell yeah I voted for this!” and how he probably has one of the most coherent and internally consistent reasons for voting Republican out of anyone who did.

  • gogonan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I’d like to measure my love for dogs on some z-axis which is unassociated with the dog-murder-to-dog-rape spectrum please

  • Tidesphere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    I read somewhere that the same provision that forbade bestiality also disqualifies people who have been found to have paid for sex three or more times in the last ten years. I think that what’s actually happening is that Patel, or a buddy of his, got caught hiring prostitutes a few too many times, and now want to repeal the rule so they don’t get kicked out.

    But someone saw ‘bestiality’ and decided to make it about that to distract people.

    • anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      Then they could have removed the prostitution clause and kept the bestiality one.
      Also he literally defended removing the latter in front of Congress.

  • temptationscattreats@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    Great news for me! I was ready to congratulate all the people I know who have committed acts of bestiality, even set aside a couple hours on my calendar for it. Didn’t need even a moment of that two hour block because I don’t know a single person who’s ever done that sort of thing.

    Now I got two hours to kill and started thinking about something my uncle used to say “I’m fucking this cat, you just hold the tail.” Which was a pretty vulgar thing to say to a 10 year old but also what the fuck Uncle Mike?

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s easy to forget about traitors like Kristi Noem once they’re out of the spotlight. Hopefully this country doesn’t forget to dispense justice to that particular traitor when this is all over. Same goes for traitor Greg Bovino.

  • rmrf@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    So like, for real though, the justification for this was that there are people who are victims of trafficking that are forced into this, right?

    At face value, that makes sense. I’m not sure whether every state that convicts for beastiality would also create exceptions for victims of trafficking who were forced into it, they certainly do not when it comes to other offenses.

    Is there something I’ve missed?

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yes, you missed that it wasn’t for the victims, they’re probably already covered for that. It was for people involved in bestiality in general.

      While Patel characterized the change as nondiscriminatory toward victims, Durbin refuted the notion and claimed it was a way to protect those who engaged in bestiality.

      “You dropped automatic disqualification for applicants who have been engaged in bestiality, not victims of bestiality, applicants who have engaged,” Durbin said to Patel.

      https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/15/kash-patel-fbi-hiring-policy-bestiality

      • ryper@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        I think Kash heard his bros talking about fucking lots of “bitches” and totally misunderstood.

      • rmrf@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        they’re probably already covered for that

        Can you ELI5 how an automatic disqualifier based on a conviction that doesn’t account for whether or not someone is a victim doesn’t automatically disqualify those victims without just saying they’re “probably already covered”

        Edit to add: I don’t see the relevance of what person C says if person A and B aren’t going to be taken at their word, either. Durbin’s words on the topic matter only as much as anyone else’s in a vacuum, and his claim as to what is and isn’t currently policy is as meaningless as anyone else’s if it’s unsubstantiated

      • rmrf@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I don’t think Kash is attending most interviews, and I while I use someone’s name as a reason to raise an eyebrow and look into something more than I typically would, I don’t base my reason for it being bad solely on the name of the person who did it.

  • TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    167
    ·
    7 days ago

    Of all the insane shit that’s spewed out of that godforsaken country these last 10 years, watching this man try to talk about ensuring victims of bestiality related sex trafficking were still able to apply to the FBI with a straight face was amongst the most insane things I’ve ever seen in my fucking life

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s fascism. It starts out insane and then just gets crazier from there.

      These are people that shouldn’t be operating a hot dog stand, but the dumbest among us elected a felon rapist conman and these are the people he identifies with, so that’s who gets to run the show.

      You can thank our dipshit conservatives and the dipshits that didn’t vote.

      • baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        63
        ·
        7 days ago

        A Republican asked, when Patel said both sides, "you mean the animal? " Patel give a small smile and said something to the effect of no, we got some great canines. Patel goes on to say there’s victims of sexual trafficking forced into bestiality and candidates have been automatically disqualified even though they are victims, but we all know it’s cause they’re letting in weirdos and sexual predators that are like minded and loyal to the regime.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          7 days ago

          Either that or they’re exceptionally desperate to make a distraction.

          All of this shit is less believable than the oil crisis and the price of food.

          • Snapz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            7 days ago

            Completely. This is distraction attempt equivalent to “trans kids taking over sports!!!” claims when A) quit fixating on children’s genitals you actual pedophiles and B) actual number of trans kids in these sports is like -4 out of 3 million kids in youth sports. They are getting desperate…

            Next up, “Victims of bodily probing by aliens should not have to shop at grocery stores with tall people in green/gray clothing!!!” “ALL kids in public elementary schools are being forced to use used Capri sun pouches as catheters and then they feed the collected pee to conservative seniors who vote by mail”

      • TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        Tried to imply that these people may have been victims of sex trafficking forced to perform bestiality.